2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.16.435380
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast holographic scattering compensation for deep tissue biological imaging

Abstract: Scattering in biological tissues is a major barrier for in vivo optical imaging of all but the most superficial structures. Progress toward overcoming the distortions caused by scattering in turbid media has been made by shaping the excitation wavefront to redirect power into a single point in the imaging plane. However, fast, non-invasive determination of the required wavefront compensation remains challenging. Here, we introduce a quickly converging algorithm for non-invasive scattering compensation, termed … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different guidestar-based methods have been developed (24), which use fluorescent targets such as beads (25), photoacoustic feedback (26) or ultrasound (27)(28)(29) to determine the wavefront correction map. An alternative approach is to determine the correction by modulating the SLM pixels to iteratively improve the correction pattern (30)(31)(32)(33). However, the measurement speed of this approach is limited by the modulation speed of the SLM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different guidestar-based methods have been developed (24), which use fluorescent targets such as beads (25), photoacoustic feedback (26) or ultrasound (27)(28)(29) to determine the wavefront correction map. An alternative approach is to determine the correction by modulating the SLM pixels to iteratively improve the correction pattern (30)(31)(32)(33). However, the measurement speed of this approach is limited by the modulation speed of the SLM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual cortex and Hippocampus of mouse brain in vivo [39] Synaptic structures in the deep cortical region of a Thy1-GFP mouse brain [40] High and basal dendritic spines of a mouse V1 neuron in vivo [41] GFP expressed microtubule of Drosophila larval macrophage [42] GFP-expressed pyramidal neuron in a living mouse brain [43] Single microglia cell from hippocampus tissue of a mouse brain [44] Coherence-gating Label-free, High sensing speed / Mixed phase retardations of input and output paths, Deal with low-order aberration modes…”
Section: Technical Improvement For Deep-tissue Imaging Based On Adapt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted with permission from Ref. [44]. Scale bar in b, 5 μm below 630 μm in a living brain were acquired by using a three-photon laser combined with F-SHRAP (Fig.…”
Section: Indirect Wavefront Sensing For Ao Fluorescence Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technically, larger field of view in imaging through scattering media would require AO correction at an update rate equal to the pixel scan rate divided by the size of the memory effect of the medium in pixel units. While fast wavefront shaping based on highspeed spatial light modulators [11][12][13] and hybrid strategies 8,14,15 was developed to tackle the fast decorrelation time of biological tissues in depth, their update speeds remain too slow to keep up with typical pixel scan rates. Sufficiently fast wavefront update was so far only demonstrated in one dimension and without implementation into a microscope 16 .…”
Section: Main Text (1556/1500 Words)mentioning
confidence: 99%