2019
DOI: 10.1108/aeat-09-2018-0246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast high fidelity CFD/CSM fluid structure interaction using RBF mesh morphing and modal superposition method

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to present a fast and effective approach to tackle complex fluid structure interaction problems that are relevant for the aeronautical design. Design/methodology/approach High fidelity computer-aided engineering models (computational fluid dynamics [CFD] and computational structural mechanics) are coupled by embedding modal shapes into the CFD solver using RBF mesh morphing. Findings The theoretical framework is first explained and its use is then demonstrated with a review of appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other works have imported fluid and solid solutions to the same software (although still using different discretizing methods) and realized a weakly two-way coupling of FSI, for example, Di Domenico et al (2018) and Groth et al (2019). In weakly two-way coupling, per time step, the fluid solution is first passed to the solid part to induce the solid deformation, and then the solid deformation is used to update fluid mesh; however, the velocity and pressure of the fluid field are not further solved based on the updated fluid mesh.…”
Section: Used the Eigenfunction Expansion Methods Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other works have imported fluid and solid solutions to the same software (although still using different discretizing methods) and realized a weakly two-way coupling of FSI, for example, Di Domenico et al (2018) and Groth et al (2019). In weakly two-way coupling, per time step, the fluid solution is first passed to the solid part to induce the solid deformation, and then the solid deformation is used to update fluid mesh; however, the velocity and pressure of the fluid field are not further solved based on the updated fluid mesh.…”
Section: Used the Eigenfunction Expansion Methods Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the results obtained from the Structural-CFD analysis for the baseline geometrical configuration of flexible components, the changes in shape and size were applied to the geometry of the flexible components according to the geometrical specifications and tolerances. The RBF solutions related to these changes were generated using the 'Surfs' and 'Encap' features of RBF Morph ™ [30]. In particular, for each shape modification a set of surfaces "Surfs" was used to fix the nodes that are required not to change their position, a cylindrical "Encap" to deform the surfaces inside a proper domain, limiting the morphing action while respecting the tolerances.…”
Section: Rbf Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cardiovascular field, morphing approaches were employed in [9] for the registration procedures of the cardiac muscle and to model an aorta aneurysm by exploiting a one-way FSI [10,11,12]. In literature RBF have been extensively employed to tackle FSI problems [13], using the modal method for both static [14,15] and transient simulations [16,17,18], as well as the two-way approach [19,20] with RBF-based mapping methods [21]. In this work the state of the art regarding biomedical one-way FSI applications, as shown in [12], is further improved for a transient simulation by taking into account the non-linear deformations of the wetted surfaces during motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%