Abstract:Background
Vital signs have been widely adopted in in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) assessment, which plays an important role in inpatient deterioration detection. As the number of early warning systems and artificial intelligence applications increases, health care information exchange and interoperability are becoming more complex and difficult. Although Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) have already developed a vital signs profile, it is not sufficient to support … Show more
“…These AI models and algorithms may accomplish various tasks, such as data extraction, clinical decision assistance, and prognosis prediction. In addition, AI may forecast multiple health-related results, such as cancer, sepsis, heart failure, in-hospital cardiac arrest, and COVID-19-related resource utilization [ 30 , 32 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Several measures, including area under the curve (AUC), precision score, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and F-measure, were used to evaluate the performance of algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FHIR is the most current HL7 system standard [ 54 ]. It was first introduced in March 2014, and multiple technical design studies conducted between 2018 and 2022 favored FHIR as their preferred standard [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. HL7 messaging systems were used by [ 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 ] to gather their input information, and some authors tried to improve their data collection quality using HL7 version 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HL7 messaging systems were used by [ 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 ] to gather their input information, and some authors tried to improve their data collection quality using HL7 version 2. Nevertheless, adopting the most recent standard, FHIR can increase the study’s reliability due to its modern design, integrated data exchange, standardized resources, and enhanced support for current healthcare use cases, such as patient portals [ 41 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. However, other studies conducted during different time frames did not specify the standard used [ 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using pre-existing web standards such as RESTful Application Programming Interfaces (API) and XML or JSON data exchange formats, which are lightweight and easy for individuals and machines to understand, has helped FHIR gain preference [ 5 , 58 ]. For HIEs, using Restful API offers many advantages, including scalability, speed, and adaptability, as demonstrated by Amrollahi et al [ 42 ], Tseng et al [ 41 ], and Henry et al [ 43 ]. Still, it is also necessary to handle their complexities and security risks.…”
Electronic health record (EHR) systems collate patient data, and the integration and standardization of documents through Health Information Exchange (HIE) play a pivotal role in refining patient management. Although the clinical implications of AI in EHR systems have been extensively analyzed, its application in HIE as a crucial source of patient data is less explored. Addressing this gap, our systematic review delves into utilizing AI models in HIE, gauging their predictive prowess and potential limitations. Employing databases such as Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, and Web of Science and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, we unearthed 1021 publications. Of these, 11 were shortlisted for the final analysis. A noticeable preference for machine learning models in prognosticating clinical results, notably in oncology and cardiac failures, was evident. The metrics displayed AUC values ranging between 61% and 99.91%. Sensitivity metrics spanned from 12% to 96.50%, specificity from 76.30% to 98.80%, positive predictive values varied from 83.70% to 94.10%, and negative predictive values between 94.10% and 99.10%. Despite variations in specific metrics, AI models drawing on HIE data unfailingly showcased commendable predictive proficiency in clinical verdicts, emphasizing the transformative potential of melding AI with HIE. However, variations in sensitivity highlight underlying challenges. As healthcare’s path becomes more enmeshed with AI, a well-rounded, enlightened approach is pivotal to guarantee the delivery of trustworthy and effective AI-augmented healthcare solutions.
“…These AI models and algorithms may accomplish various tasks, such as data extraction, clinical decision assistance, and prognosis prediction. In addition, AI may forecast multiple health-related results, such as cancer, sepsis, heart failure, in-hospital cardiac arrest, and COVID-19-related resource utilization [ 30 , 32 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Several measures, including area under the curve (AUC), precision score, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and F-measure, were used to evaluate the performance of algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FHIR is the most current HL7 system standard [ 54 ]. It was first introduced in March 2014, and multiple technical design studies conducted between 2018 and 2022 favored FHIR as their preferred standard [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. HL7 messaging systems were used by [ 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 ] to gather their input information, and some authors tried to improve their data collection quality using HL7 version 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HL7 messaging systems were used by [ 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 ] to gather their input information, and some authors tried to improve their data collection quality using HL7 version 2. Nevertheless, adopting the most recent standard, FHIR can increase the study’s reliability due to its modern design, integrated data exchange, standardized resources, and enhanced support for current healthcare use cases, such as patient portals [ 41 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. However, other studies conducted during different time frames did not specify the standard used [ 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using pre-existing web standards such as RESTful Application Programming Interfaces (API) and XML or JSON data exchange formats, which are lightweight and easy for individuals and machines to understand, has helped FHIR gain preference [ 5 , 58 ]. For HIEs, using Restful API offers many advantages, including scalability, speed, and adaptability, as demonstrated by Amrollahi et al [ 42 ], Tseng et al [ 41 ], and Henry et al [ 43 ]. Still, it is also necessary to handle their complexities and security risks.…”
Electronic health record (EHR) systems collate patient data, and the integration and standardization of documents through Health Information Exchange (HIE) play a pivotal role in refining patient management. Although the clinical implications of AI in EHR systems have been extensively analyzed, its application in HIE as a crucial source of patient data is less explored. Addressing this gap, our systematic review delves into utilizing AI models in HIE, gauging their predictive prowess and potential limitations. Employing databases such as Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, and Web of Science and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, we unearthed 1021 publications. Of these, 11 were shortlisted for the final analysis. A noticeable preference for machine learning models in prognosticating clinical results, notably in oncology and cardiac failures, was evident. The metrics displayed AUC values ranging between 61% and 99.91%. Sensitivity metrics spanned from 12% to 96.50%, specificity from 76.30% to 98.80%, positive predictive values varied from 83.70% to 94.10%, and negative predictive values between 94.10% and 99.10%. Despite variations in specific metrics, AI models drawing on HIE data unfailingly showcased commendable predictive proficiency in clinical verdicts, emphasizing the transformative potential of melding AI with HIE. However, variations in sensitivity highlight underlying challenges. As healthcare’s path becomes more enmeshed with AI, a well-rounded, enlightened approach is pivotal to guarantee the delivery of trustworthy and effective AI-augmented healthcare solutions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.