1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(98)00115-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast global registration of 3D sampled surfaces using a multi-z-buffer technique

Abstract: We

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has typically been used as an acceleration method that avoids the expensive closest point finding [1,4,16]. Weik projected individual points onto the other mesh and used intensity and gradient information to find it a better mate nearby [23].…”
Section: Matching and Alignment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has typically been used as an acceleration method that avoids the expensive closest point finding [1,4,16]. Weik projected individual points onto the other mesh and used intensity and gradient information to find it a better mate nearby [23].…”
Section: Matching and Alignment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergevin et al [2] calculate a transformation for each view separately and then apply them simultaneously before the next round of matchings. Benjemaa and Schmitt [1] accelerate the method by applying the new transformation as soon it is calculated. A quite different approach was taken by Stoddart and Hilton [20] and Eggert et al [8].…”
Section: Multiview Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finding the closest point in the other surface [2][9] [10]. This computation may be accelerated using a k-d tree.…”
Section: Correspondence Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benjemaa [23] proposed a multi-z-buffer technique to accelerate the ICP algorithm. All points are projected in a z-buffer to perform the local search, and they claimed that this space partition speeds up the search for pointto-projection correspondences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%