2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast genetic algorithm approaches to solving discrete-time mixed integer linear programming problems of capacity planning and scheduling of biopharmaceutical manufacture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to shared variables w in Equations (10) and (11), these equations cannot be solved separately. Therefore, two different sets of shared variables are introduced in model of TS and DS and reformulate Equations (10) and (11). Moreover, in traditional approach, TSO optimizes its objective and provide shared variables, T k called targets.…”
Section: Generalized Hierarchical Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to shared variables w in Equations (10) and (11), these equations cannot be solved separately. Therefore, two different sets of shared variables are introduced in model of TS and DS and reformulate Equations (10) and (11). Moreover, in traditional approach, TSO optimizes its objective and provide shared variables, T k called targets.…”
Section: Generalized Hierarchical Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes coordinator problem a mixed integer linear problem (MILP). As discussed in previous studies for large‐scale MILP, evolutionary algorithms perform better than traditional optimization techniques . Hence, coordinator will send targets (local bests) to TSO and DSOs if optimization algorithm does not provide global solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Math-ematical programming models under uncertainty have used methods such as chance-constrained programming (Lakhdar et al, 2006) or dealt with uncertainty through scenario analysis (Siganporia et al, 2014). Recently there have been genetic algorithm (GA) (Holland, 1975) approaches to production planning predominantly for batch processes such as work done in studies by Oyebolu et al (2017) and Jankauskas et al (2017Jankauskas et al ( , 2019. Dynamic and stochastic simulation models for perfusion culture have focused on capturing the impact of failures and variability on cost of goods rather than on optimal scheduling or planning (Pollock et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking inspiration from GA-based approaches to job-shop scheduling, Oyebolu et al (2017) proposed a problem-tailored construction heuristic for scheduling demands of multiple products sequentially across several facilities to generate a long-term manufacturing schedule. Jankauskas et al (2018) developed fast genetic algorithm approaches for generating near optimal solutions to medium-and long-term biopharmaceutical planning problems formulated originally as discrete-time MILP models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%