2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast-food outlet availability and obesity: Considering variation by age and methodological diversity in 22,889 Yorkshire Health Study participants

Abstract: The Leeds Beckett repository holds a wide range of publications, each of which has been checked for copyright and the relevant embargo period has been applied by the Research Services team. We operate on a standard take-down policy. If you are the author or publisher of an output and you would like it removed from the repository, please contact us and we will investigate on a case-by-case basis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings contrast with the null findings observed in the present study, and may be attributed to the relatively high age of our study population (on average ~ 70 years). Indeed, there is evidence that suggests that consumption of take-away meals declines with age [ 23 ], which may be due to the fact that older adults have less income [ 37 ], experience reduced mobility [ 26 ] (e.g., go outside less, so are less susceptible to the tempting food environment) or did not acquire the habit of obtaining fast-food in their youth as fast-food restaurants were less proliferate [ 38 ]. Moreover, other methodological differences (e.g., different model adjustment and buffer sizes) or different geographical contexts could account for the contrasting findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings contrast with the null findings observed in the present study, and may be attributed to the relatively high age of our study population (on average ~ 70 years). Indeed, there is evidence that suggests that consumption of take-away meals declines with age [ 23 ], which may be due to the fact that older adults have less income [ 37 ], experience reduced mobility [ 26 ] (e.g., go outside less, so are less susceptible to the tempting food environment) or did not acquire the habit of obtaining fast-food in their youth as fast-food restaurants were less proliferate [ 38 ]. Moreover, other methodological differences (e.g., different model adjustment and buffer sizes) or different geographical contexts could account for the contrasting findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous studies mainly investigated absolute measures using counts or densities [ 11 , 13 15 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 24 26 ] rather than relative measures of FFR exposure, in which exposure is often defined as the proportion of FFR relative to other food outlets or restaurants [ 16 , 19 , 27 , 28 ]. As such, relative measures of FFR capture the availability of other competing food outlets that may co-locate with FFR, and therefore reflect the opportunities for (un)healthy food choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 Similarly to other developed nations, this shift in dietary patterns has been coupled with increasing rates of overweight, obesity and associated chronic disease. 32 Socially and economically disadvantaged groups, including people experiencing food insecurity, appear to be particularly vulnerable and are specially targeted by fast or convenience food marketing. 33 Indeed, the greater density of fast food and takeaway outlets apparent in lower socio‐economic areas is evidenced in strategic targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the few large studies to explore differences by population sub‐groups, mobility trajectories of older men and women were higher during young adulthood and declined in early adulthood through to older adulthood (Falkingham et al., 2016). It is therefore reasonable to suggest that the residential neighbourhood environment may play a more important role in shaping daily life: to a greater extent for individuals who remain closer to home, such as older adults with reduced mobility or those who live close to many facilities in city centres (Hobbs et al., 2019; Rabe & Taylor, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%