2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.00632
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Flux Entangling Gate for Fluxonium Circuits

Yinqi Chen,
Konstantin N. Nesterov,
Vladimir E. Manucharyan
et al.

Abstract: We analyze a high-fidelity two-qubit gate using fast flux pulses on superconducting fluxonium qubits. The gate is realized by temporarily detuning magnetic flux through fluxonium loop away from the half flux quantum sweet spot. We simulate dynamics of two capacitively coupled fluxoniums during the flux pulses and optimize the pulse parameters to obtain a highly accurate √ iswap-like entangling gate. We also evaluate the effect of the flux noise and qubit relaxation on the gate fidelity. Our results demonstrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider these three gates since these are the parameterized versions of the most commonly used entangling gates. Further, the iswap(Θ) and cz(Θ) gates are easily implemented in superconducting circuits using capacitive coupling [29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37]. Note that for Θ = 0,…”
Section: Two-qubit Entangling Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider these three gates since these are the parameterized versions of the most commonly used entangling gates. Further, the iswap(Θ) and cz(Θ) gates are easily implemented in superconducting circuits using capacitive coupling [29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37]. Note that for Θ = 0,…”
Section: Two-qubit Entangling Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because fluxonium spectrum is anharmonic, a strong drive amplitude in that proposal does not cause significant leakage to noncomputational levels, and gate fidelity is therefore not spoiled by shorter coherence times of higher excited states. Another methods to remain in the computational subspace are to implement flux-tunable gates [32][33][34] or tunable couplers [35], although these schemes may incur firstorder flux noise and require added hardware complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental implementation showed gate fidelity as high as 0.992, limited by the coherence times of the participating non-computational states, which are unprotected [58,59]. Recently, an iSWAP gate [60] between two planar capacitively-coupled fluxoniums was realized by tuning their computational transitions ω 01 's to be onresonant using fast flux, with corresponding gate fidelity as high as 0.997 [61]. The performance of this gate scheme is intrinsically limited by the lower coherence time away from the flux sweet spot, and its operation may involve additional complications such as spectator errors in large-scale devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%