2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast fluorometric enumeration of E. coli using passive chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum actual capture rate was 87.27%, and the best capture time was 10 min while the traditional cultivation detection time is 18 to 24 h. There was a good linear relationship (R 2 = 0.9926 > 0.90) between the average fluorescence optical density of the chip and the concentration from 4.91 × 10 to 4.91 × 10 7 cfu/μL. Therefore, the minimum detection limit is 4.91 × 10 cfu/μL, and the maximum is 4.91 × 10 7 cfu/μL, which is in accordance with the passive microfluidic chip trend as well [34]. The cost of the microfluidic chip designed in this experiment is approximately RMB 10, less than one tenth of the current market price.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The maximum actual capture rate was 87.27%, and the best capture time was 10 min while the traditional cultivation detection time is 18 to 24 h. There was a good linear relationship (R 2 = 0.9926 > 0.90) between the average fluorescence optical density of the chip and the concentration from 4.91 × 10 to 4.91 × 10 7 cfu/μL. Therefore, the minimum detection limit is 4.91 × 10 cfu/μL, and the maximum is 4.91 × 10 7 cfu/μL, which is in accordance with the passive microfluidic chip trend as well [34]. The cost of the microfluidic chip designed in this experiment is approximately RMB 10, less than one tenth of the current market price.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In our previous studies, we generated quantum dot nanoparticles (QDs) as labels and fluorescence measurements were described in order to evaluate the applicability of the method using tap water and lake water samples [ 17 , 19 ]. The main limitation in the fluorescence-based immunoassay is the time-consuming modification steps of QDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plate counting (24–48 h) methods should be replaced by novel biosensor systems as an alternative reliable pathogen detection technique, demonstrated by the use of nanoparticles in last few years [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. In these developed biosensor systems, different analytical techniques are used, such as surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], fluorescence [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 23 , 24 ], electrochemical methods [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] and colorimetric methods [ 28 , 29 ]. SERS is a very good alternative analytical technique due to its high sensitivity, which can even detect a single bacterium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In passive microfluidics, the progress of the fluids in the channels is obtained through the internal dynamics of the system, i.e., the system is kept at a certain slope or under pressure [ 21 , 22 ]. In some passive chips, liquids are transferred to the system through access holes by pipetting, and the liquids remain constant in the system while target cells loaded with magnetic particles are moved using an external magnetic field [ 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%