2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41528-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast, Flexible, and Minimal CTL Synthesis via SMT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global minimality of guard conditions is not guaranteed due to the two-stage implementation: minimal guards may correspond to another base model, not the one found on the first stage. The same argument applies against any approach based on state machine minimization [23]. In addition, LTL properties are not supported.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Global minimality of guard conditions is not guaranteed due to the two-stage implementation: minimal guards may correspond to another base model, not the one found on the first stage. The same argument applies against any approach based on state machine minimization [23]. In addition, LTL properties are not supported.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our satisfiability algorithm for SL[SG] applies the technique used earlier for monotonic theories for checking both CTL satifiability (Bayless et al 2015;Klenze, Bayless, and Hu 2016) and ATL satisfiablity (Kacprzak, Niewiadomski, and Penczek 2020). Although SL[SG] is not a monotone theory, we show how the same technique can be applied in this case.…”
Section: Monotonic Theory For Sl[sg]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper is not the first one adopting that approach. Here we build on the results for CTL (Klenze, Bayless, and Hu 2016) and ATL (Niewiadomski et al 2020). The main contributions for SL [SG] consist in: a new encoding method for SL[SG] models, new proofs of monotonicity of the relation |= for SL [SG] in some cases, new definitions of over-and under-approximations for SL[SG] partial models, new proofs of the correctness of the method for the formulae prefixed with strategy quantifiers and bindings, and a new implementation and the tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we propose a solution to the first stage of the synthesis problem, which consists in finding a model for a given ATL formula. For this purpose, we adopt the method based on SAT Modulo Monotonic Theories (SMMT) [26] used to search for models of the CTL formulae. This technique was introduced by Bayless et al in [4] for building efficient lazy SMT solvers for Boolean monotonic theories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was introduced by Bayless et al in [4] for building efficient lazy SMT solvers for Boolean monotonic theories. Next, Klenze et al in [26] presented how the SMMT framework can be used to build an SMT solver for CTL model checking theory, and how to perform efficient and scalable CTL synthesis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%