2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2019.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast exact algorithms for some connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width

Abstract: Given a clique-width k-expression of a graph G, we provide 2 O(k) · n time algorithms for connectivity constraints on locally checkable properties such as Node-Weighted Steiner Tree, Connected Dominating Set, or Connected Vertex Cover. We also propose a 2 O(k) · n time algorithm for Feedback Vertex Set. The best running times for all the considered cases were either 2 O(k·log(k)) · n O(1) or worse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pino et al [26] used Cut&Count and rank-based approach to get single-exponential time algorithms for connectivity problems parametrized by branchwidth. Recently, Cut&Count was also applied in the context of cliquewidth [2], and of Qrankwidth, rankwidth, and MIM-width [3]. All these algorithms have exponential space complexity, as they follow the standard dynamic programming approach.…”
Section: Approximation Of Treedepthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pino et al [26] used Cut&Count and rank-based approach to get single-exponential time algorithms for connectivity problems parametrized by branchwidth. Recently, Cut&Count was also applied in the context of cliquewidth [2], and of Qrankwidth, rankwidth, and MIM-width [3]. All these algorithms have exponential space complexity, as they follow the standard dynamic programming approach.…”
Section: Approximation Of Treedepthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other graph problems where boundedness of clique-width is used to classify their computational complexity on hereditary graph classes, see, for example, [28,44]. We refer to [11,41,79,80,89] for parameterized complexity results on clique-width.…”
Section: Algorithmic Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Graph Isomorphism is solvable in polynomial time on G if G is equivalent 11 to a class of (H 1 , H 2 )-free graphs such that one of the following holds:…”
Section: Graph Colouringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same paper they reduced this number to 7 and gave the following state-of-the-art summary; recall that K + 1,t and K ++ 1,t are the graphs obtained from K 1,t by subdividing one edge once or twice, respectively. Theorem 5.8 ( [19]) For a class G of graphs defined by two forbidden induced subgraphs, the following holds: 11 to a class of (H 1 , H 2 )-free graphs such that one of the following holds:…”
Section: Graph Colouringmentioning
confidence: 99%