2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-018-1209-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast detection of community structures using graph traversal in social networks

Abstract: Finding community structures in social networks is considered to be a challenging task as many of the proposed algorithms are computationally expensive and does not scale well for large graphs. Most of the community detection algorithms proposed till date are unsuitable for applications that would require detection of communities in real-time, especially for massive networks. The Louvain method, which uses modularity maximization to detect clusters, is usually considered to be one of the fastest community dete… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, d c refers to the sum of degrees of nodes in a community such as C: Afterwards, we compared our proposed algorithm with some well-known and essential community detection algorithms. For this, we compared the Gravity algorithm with Louvain (Blondel et al 2008), LINCOM (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019), LexDFS (Creusefond et al 2017), LPA (Raghavan et al 2007), and Infomap (Rosvall and Bergstrom 2008). (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019) compares Louvain, LINCOM, LexDFS, LPA, and Infomap with each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, d c refers to the sum of degrees of nodes in a community such as C: Afterwards, we compared our proposed algorithm with some well-known and essential community detection algorithms. For this, we compared the Gravity algorithm with Louvain (Blondel et al 2008), LINCOM (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019), LexDFS (Creusefond et al 2017), LPA (Raghavan et al 2007), and Infomap (Rosvall and Bergstrom 2008). (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019) compares Louvain, LINCOM, LexDFS, LPA, and Infomap with each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we compared the Gravity algorithm with Louvain (Blondel et al 2008), LINCOM (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019), LexDFS (Creusefond et al 2017), LPA (Raghavan et al 2007), and Infomap (Rosvall and Bergstrom 2008). (Basuchowdhuri et al 2019) compares Louvain, LINCOM, LexDFS, LPA, and Infomap with each other. In Table 5, we compare the speed of all algorithms with the speed of the slowest one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Community structures exist in many networks in the real world, such as social networks, e-commerce networks, biological networks, routing networks, and so on. In recent years, community structure detection of complex networks has attracted much attention, and a series of complex network mining algorithms have been proposed [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. The identification of community structure in the network has great application value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%