2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast crustal deformation computing method for multiple computations accelerated by a graphics processing unit cluster

Abstract: As high-resolution observational data become more common, the demand for numerical simulations of crustal deformation using 3-D high-fidelity modelling is increasing. To increase the efficiency of performing numerical simulations with high computation costs, we developed a fast solver using heterogeneous computing, with graphics processing units (GPUs) and central processing units, and then used the solver in crustal deformation computations. The solver was based on an iterative solver and was devised so that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the advantage of addition of observation points in the offshore area is expected to be more pronounced with model error than illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, the analyses with model error requires plenty number of calculations for Green's functions of various 3D heterogeneous structures with model error but we think it is possible to demonstrate with GPU application as in this study and also Yamaguchi et al (2017a), Yamaguchi et al (2017b).…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Coseismic Slipmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the advantage of addition of observation points in the offshore area is expected to be more pronounced with model error than illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, the analyses with model error requires plenty number of calculations for Green's functions of various 3D heterogeneous structures with model error but we think it is possible to demonstrate with GPU application as in this study and also Yamaguchi et al (2017a), Yamaguchi et al (2017b).…”
Section: Results and Discussion For Coseismic Slipmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As yet, few studies have sufficiently focused on the quantitative evaluation of the improvement in the accuracy of coseismic slip distribution and interseismic slip-deficit distribution estimations following the incorporation of such observational data. Previous studies that assess the detection ability enhancement through increasing the number of observation points do exist (e.g., Suito, 2016;Sathiakumar et al, 2017;Agata et al, 2019), while the effect of the model error in terms of the underground structure assumed in the data analysis on the estimation results has also been evaluated (Yamaguchi et al, 2017a;Yamaguchi et al, 2017b). However, few studies have quantitatively evaluated the effect of observation error on the estimation results of plate interface slip distribution focusing on the observation of the seafloor crustal deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fault slip estimation methods in the next generation can be designed by considering the techniques of approximating the target PDF using an ensemble of sample models, narrowing down the model space by choosing candidate models from the ensemble, and incorporating realistic understructure models when generating the ensemble. Yamaguchi et al (2017) is an example of introducing stochastic modeling based on an ensemble of candidate underground structure models for fault slip estimation. This study calculated 1,000 coefficient matrices based on 1,000 different seismic velocity models and performed inversion analyses 1,000 times using each of the coefficient matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%