ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2019.8683641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Compressive Sensing Recovery Using Generative Models with Structured Latent Variables

Abstract: Deep learning models have significantly improved the visual quality and accuracy on compressive sensing recovery. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for signal reconstruction from compressed measurements with image priors captured by a generative model. We search and constrain on latent variable space to make the method stable when the number of compressed measurements is extremely limited. We show that, by exploiting certain structures of the latent variables, the proposed method produces improved reconst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later efforts focused on solving problems with specific structures, e.g., NLR (Nonlocal Low-Rank Regularization) [67] and SGSR (Structural Group Sparse Representation) [48]. Nowadays, combining compressed sensing with the popular deep learning, the deep-CS [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] becomes the focus of current research. Owing to the complex structures of trees, it is challenging to select an algorithm that satisfies both criterions of low computation time and high accuracy.…”
Section: Selection Of Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later efforts focused on solving problems with specific structures, e.g., NLR (Nonlocal Low-Rank Regularization) [67] and SGSR (Structural Group Sparse Representation) [48]. Nowadays, combining compressed sensing with the popular deep learning, the deep-CS [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] becomes the focus of current research. Owing to the complex structures of trees, it is challenging to select an algorithm that satisfies both criterions of low computation time and high accuracy.…”
Section: Selection Of Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, to a certain extent, the real-time images can reflect the influence of atmosphere turbulence. To test the effectiveness of the image saving, we determined the parameters in a reconstructed image from four different algorithms for comparison: Irls [ 17 ], ISTA-Net [ 22 ] and Ols [ 20 , 21 ] and FCSR [ 23 ]. Images without noise but still with distortion of atmosphere turbulence are used for this controlled experiment.…”
Section: Image Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, it is a mature technology for this problem by use of traditional optimization or deep-learning methods [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider generative model based compressive sensing (GMCS) [12][13][14][15][16], as opposed to sparsityprior-based CS. Most commonly used generative models are variational auto-encoders (VAE) [17] or generative adversarial networks (GAN) [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%