2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast codebook search algorithms based on tree-structured vector quantization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each node of the tree examines only one component of the training vector. The study in [24] presents a full search equivalent TSVQ (FSE-TSVQ) approach, which is an improvement to TSVQ. It can obtain the closest codevector for each input vector.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node of the tree examines only one component of the training vector. The study in [24] presents a full search equivalent TSVQ (FSE-TSVQ) approach, which is an improvement to TSVQ. It can obtain the closest codevector for each input vector.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, VQ conducts a full search to ensure that a codeword is best matched with an arbitrary input vector, but the full search requires an enormous computational load. Thus, a continuous effort has been made to simplify the search complexity of an encoding process in a great volume of published studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. These approaches are further classified into three types in terms of the way the complexity is simplified, including the tree-structured VQ (TSVQ) techniques [14][15][16], the TIE-based approaches [18][19][20] and the equal-average equal-variance equal-norm nearest neighbor search (EEENNS) based algorithms [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, VQ conducts a full search to ensure a codeword best matched with an arbitrary input vector, but a full search requires an enormous computational load. Thus, as in a great volume of published studies [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], a continuous effort has been made to simplify the search complexity of an encoding process. These approaches are further classified into two types in terms of the way the complexity is simplified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%