2017
DOI: 10.15407/kfnt2017.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast coalescence of post-Newtonian Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in real galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical models B, B2, and B3 have the same physical parameters, that is, mass of BHs and similar N-body hardening, but they differ in terms of binary eccentricity. According to our restricted number of models, we do not find a dependence of eccentricity on the parameters of our systems, nevertheless it can substantially affect to merging time (Sobolenko et al 2017). As expected from previous results, the binary can form in a system with any initial eccentricity, and a trend was found from a set of models whereby more circular binaries are formed as cusps become steeper (Khan et al 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Numerical models B, B2, and B3 have the same physical parameters, that is, mass of BHs and similar N-body hardening, but they differ in terms of binary eccentricity. According to our restricted number of models, we do not find a dependence of eccentricity on the parameters of our systems, nevertheless it can substantially affect to merging time (Sobolenko et al 2017). As expected from previous results, the binary can form in a system with any initial eccentricity, and a trend was found from a set of models whereby more circular binaries are formed as cusps become steeper (Khan et al 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We also calculate the characteristic strain for all BH merger cases, using estimated parameters at the redshift corresponding to our calculated merger time (Column 8 of Table 2), assuming that t ′ = 0 corresponds to z = 3. The strain signal is calculated using two body Hermite 4 th order Post Newtonian code (Sobolenko et al 2017;Berczik et al 2011Berczik et al , 2013 which calculates the orbital evolution of the SMBH GW merger up to the separation of the last few Schwarzschild radius. LISA sensitivity curve is plotted in accordance with Amaro-Seoane et al (2017); Moore et al (2015) and a very helpful online GW plotting page http://gwplotter.com/.…”
Section: Estimated Merger Time Of Bh Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their full expressions can be found in Blanchet (2006, equation 168). The detailed references and complete descriptions of the equation of motion in PN formalism up to 3.5PN can be found at Blanchet (2006), Kupi et al (2006), Berentzen et al (2008), Berentzen et al (2009), Brem et al (2013), Sobolenko et al (2017).…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Smbh Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our model with maximum and turning on PN terms ( = 500k, RAND = 3, HMP : LMP = 10:1) we also calculated the expected amplitude-frequency picture for SMBHB merging in NGC 6240. For the simple waveform calculation we used the GW quadrupole term expressions from Kidder (1995) (also see Brem et al 2013;Sobolenko et al 2017):…”
Section: Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%