2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast calculation method of optimal flux‐barrier‐end position for torque ripple minimisation in SynRMs with and without PMs

Abstract: This study presents a simplified analytical model for synchronous reluctance machines (SynRMs) with and without permanent magnets (PMs) to rapidly investigate the influences of flux-barrier-end angles or salient poles angles on the torque ripple. With the proposed method, the optimal flux-barrier-end angles or salient poles angles can be computed directly to eliminate a specific torque harmonic. To further minimise two main low-order torque harmonics, a compensation strategy is adopted by choosing different op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this background, how to decrease the vibration and noise of the motor becomes increasingly important. By optimizing the design of motor rotor structure, better motor output and vibration and noise performance can be achieved [3][4][5][6][7]. A comparative analysis of vibration and noise of different rotor structures has not been carried out in the existing literature [8,9], as many studies focus on the cause of radial force of specific rotor structures and lack the transverse comparison of different rotor structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this background, how to decrease the vibration and noise of the motor becomes increasingly important. By optimizing the design of motor rotor structure, better motor output and vibration and noise performance can be achieved [3][4][5][6][7]. A comparative analysis of vibration and noise of different rotor structures has not been carried out in the existing literature [8,9], as many studies focus on the cause of radial force of specific rotor structures and lack the transverse comparison of different rotor structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%