2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-016-9316-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Streamlines Based on a Multi-Subject Bundle Atlas

Abstract: This paper presents an algorithm for fast segmentation of white matter bundles from massive dMRI tractography datasets using a multisubject atlas. We use a distance metric to compare streamlines in a subject dataset to labeled centroids in the atlas, and label them using a per-bundle configurable threshold. In order to reduce segmentation time, the algorithm first preprocesses the data using a simplified distance metric to rapidly discard candidate streamlines in multiple stages, while guaranteeing that no fal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The segmentation method calculates the distance d ME (equation ( 1 )) between each atlas bundle centroid and each fiber in the subject from the segmentation data set, normalized to the difference between the atlas centroid and the subject fiber lengths (Labra et al, 2017 ): where dnf is a normalization factor that penalizes the length difference between the atlas centroids and the subject fibers. A restrictive threshold was used to label the short association bundles, thus selecting only the fibers that are very similar to the atlas bundles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentation method calculates the distance d ME (equation ( 1 )) between each atlas bundle centroid and each fiber in the subject from the segmentation data set, normalized to the difference between the atlas centroid and the subject fiber lengths (Labra et al, 2017 ): where dnf is a normalization factor that penalizes the length difference between the atlas centroids and the subject fibers. A restrictive threshold was used to label the short association bundles, thus selecting only the fibers that are very similar to the atlas bundles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garyfallidis et al proposed an alternative approach wherein the streamline atlas can be directly incorporated into the clustering process . Clayden et al and Labra et al also used streamline atlases in combination with a tract similarity measure to segment tracts (Clayden et al, 2007, Clayden et al, 2009, Labra et al, 2017.ROI-and clustering-based methods involve whole series of processing steps for atlas registration, tractography, parcellation or clustering. The resulting pipelines are rather complex, computationally expensive and tedious to fine-tune.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garyfallidis et al proposed an alternative approach wherein the streamline atlas can be directly incorporated into the clustering process . Clayden et al and Labra et al also used streamline atlases in combination with a tract similarity measure to segment tracts (Clayden et al, 2007, Clayden et al, 2009, Labra et al, 2017.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the ideal distance measure therefore must always rank the pair of best‐matching fibers first, while for the use cases cited above, the absolute order is not that crucial. Analogously to Labra et al [LGD*17], we utilize multiple measures with differing accuracy and performance in order to speed up our computations. While in dMRI (for an overview see e.g., Schultz and Vilanova [SV18]) the input data are tensor fields or more general orientation fields from which the fibers have to be reconstructed with numerical methods, in our case the individual fibers are explicitly given.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%