2019
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x19830877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest

Abstract: The wild bootstrap was originally developed for regression models with heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Over the past 30 years, it has been extended to models estimated by instrumental variables and maximum likelihood and to ones where the error terms are (perhaps multiway) clustered. Like bootstrap methods in general, the wild bootstrap is especially useful when conventional inference methods are unreliable because large-sample assumptions do not hold. For example, there may be few clusters, few treated cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
437
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 669 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(129 reference statements)
5
437
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One challenge in clustering standard errors at the counselor level is that the number of observations per counselor is not balanced and the number of clusters is relatively small (25). To account for these issues, we use a wild bootstrapping approach, which performs well in cases where the number of clusters is small and the size of clusters is heterogeneous (Roodman et al ). The results of these models are very similar to the results of the models without clustered standard errors; the only notable change is that the TOT estimate for 30‐day payment delinquencies becomes significant at the 5% level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge in clustering standard errors at the counselor level is that the number of observations per counselor is not balanced and the number of clusters is relatively small (25). To account for these issues, we use a wild bootstrapping approach, which performs well in cases where the number of clusters is small and the size of clusters is heterogeneous (Roodman et al ). The results of these models are very similar to the results of the models without clustered standard errors; the only notable change is that the TOT estimate for 30‐day payment delinquencies becomes significant at the 5% level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps surprisingly, it can often be computed remarkably quickly using the Stata routine boottest; see Roodman et al. ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computations for the AR statistic can take advantage of the tricks that make the WCR bootstrap so fast (see section ), but the ones for t β cannot do so; see Roodman et al. (). Thus, in large samples, it can be much faster to bootstrap the cluster‐robust AR statistic than the cluster‐robust IV t statistic.…”
Section: Simultaneous Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless otherwise noted, the bootstrap procedure is applied here in the final specification of each regression, using the Stata module boottest, with the null hypothesis imposed (Roodman et al. ). The regression tables report significance levels using this procedure on the indicator variable, as well as adjusted standard errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%