2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2018.2877403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Systematic Design Optimization of Surface-Mounted PM Machines Using Advanced Analytical Models and Subharmonic Elimination Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the above EMCM in the model B, the equivalent parameters of PM remanence B reB and thickness h pme can be obtained as (24), (25), respectively. The radial and circumferential components of the air-gap flux density can be given by (45), (46), as shown at the top of the next page [30]- [32], where M rn , M θn is the radial and tangential magnetization, respectively. when magnetization method of surface PM is parallel magnetization, then [16]…”
Section: B Equivalent Model Based On Only a Surface Mount Pm And Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the above EMCM in the model B, the equivalent parameters of PM remanence B reB and thickness h pme can be obtained as (24), (25), respectively. The radial and circumferential components of the air-gap flux density can be given by (45), (46), as shown at the top of the next page [30]- [32], where M rn , M θn is the radial and tangential magnetization, respectively. when magnetization method of surface PM is parallel magnetization, then [16]…”
Section: B Equivalent Model Based On Only a Surface Mount Pm And Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the analytical modelling of LSPM motors is mainly conducted in either transient [17][18][19][20][21] or steady-state domains [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In [19,20], a dynamic analytical model of a 1phase LSPM motor with the starting capacitor is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to the steady-state model, various methods such as subdomain model [22,23], conformal mapping [24,25], magnetisation surface current (MSC) method [26,27] and magnetic circuit (MC) model [28][29][30] are available in the literature. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the finite-element method (FEM) is able to consider all the geometrical details of the machine and the non-linear magnetic properties of materials, the computational time is relatively high. Therefore, for the optimal design stage of the machine, analytical methods such as the SD technique [2][3][4][5][6][7], conformal mapping (CM) [8,9], winding function [10,11], magnetic islands [12] and magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) [1,12] are preferred than the numerical ones such as FEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%