2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2021.3054619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Robust Iterative Closest Point

Abstract: The Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm and its variants are a fundamental technique for rigid registration between two point sets, with wide applications in different areas from robotics to 3D reconstruction. The main drawbacks for ICP are its slow convergence as well as its sensitivity to outliers, missing data, and partial overlaps. Recent work such as Sparse ICP achieves robustness via sparsity optimization at the cost of computational speed. In this paper, we propose a new method for robust registrati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is composed of observation equations implemented with Ceres solver [ 33 ]. It is based on the commonly used Iterative Closest Point procedure [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The calibration method is independent of mechanical design and does not require any fiducial markers on the mirrors like in Chen et al [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of observation equations implemented with Ceres solver [ 33 ]. It is based on the commonly used Iterative Closest Point procedure [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The calibration method is independent of mechanical design and does not require any fiducial markers on the mirrors like in Chen et al [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red underline markers highlight the best case scenarios. Our method FGA is compuationally fast and robust compared to GA [11], BHRGA [12], FGR [13], DGR [14], DCP-v2 [15], FilterReg [16], PointNetLK [17], Fast Robust ICP [18], point-to-point ICP [6], RANSAC [19], GMMReg [20] and CPD [21].…”
Section: B Structure Of the Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, B(X) using Eq. (18) compute N(Y), N(X) using Eq. (19) τ θ ← build BH tree on X with SPM S(X) using Alg.…”
Section: Algorithm 2: Fast Gravitational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For efficiency, Bylow et al [18] have investigated the point-to-point metric and the point-to-plane metric. The Anderson acceleration strategy has been adopted to improve the convergence rate of the ICP algorithm [19,20]. For robustness against noise and outliers, researchers have developed numerous advanced methods based on many techniques, including the least trimmed squares [21], p sparsity optimization [22], nonconvex optimization [20,23], maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) [24], branch-and-bound scheme [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Anderson acceleration strategy has been adopted to improve the convergence rate of the ICP algorithm [19,20]. For robustness against noise and outliers, researchers have developed numerous advanced methods based on many techniques, including the least trimmed squares [21], p sparsity optimization [22], nonconvex optimization [20,23], maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) [24], branch-and-bound scheme [25]. Recently, deep-learning-based registration methods [26][27][28][29][30] have demonstrated promising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%