Abstract:Rationale:
The gold standard for pathogen detection and identification of complicated urinary tract infection (CUTI) remains quantitative urine culture, however, the diagnostic value of urine culture remains limited due to the time-consuming procedure and low detection rate. Here we report a case of successfully using Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) provided fast and precise detection and identification of overlapping infection in patients with CUTI with no similar reports or studies… Show more
“…Clinically, complicated UTIs are defined as those associated with factors that compromise the urinary tract or host defense, including urinary tract obstruction, immunosuppression, renal failure, and foreign bodies such as indwelling urinary catheters or other drainage devices (Lichtenberger and Hooton, 2008;Levison and Kaye, 2013). In our cases, the majority of patients had complicated UTI that showed recurrent, persistent and refractory features similar to the previous reports (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The applications of mNGS on non-sterile materials (e.g., urine) remains are still scarce and controversial. In one of the few recent studies on urine (Zhang et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022), a prospective proof-ofconcept study by Janes, V. A and colleagues confirmed the feasibility of metagenomic sequencing in detecting of urinary pathogens and drug resistance (Janes et al, 2022). We conducted a mNGS study in patients with suspected UTI and compared it with conventional test in terms of diagnostic performance, pathogenic findings to demonstrate its significance.…”
BackgroundMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising technology that allows unbiased pathogen detection and is increasingly being used for clinical diagnoses. However, its application in urinary tract infection (UTI) is still scarce.MethodsThe medical records of 33 patients with suspected UTI who were admitted to the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from March 2021 to July 2022 and received urine mNGS were retrospectively analyzed. The performance of mNGS and conventional urine culture in diagnosing infection and identifying causative organisms was compared, and the treatment effects were evaluated in terms of changes in urinalyses and urinary symptoms.ResultsIn the detection of bacteria and fungi, mNGS detected at least one pathogen in 29 (87.9%) cases, including 19 (57.6%) with positive mNGS but negative culture results and 10 (30.3%) with both mNGS and culture positive results. The remaining 4 (12.1%) patients were negative by both tests. Overall, mNGS performed better than culture (87.9% vs. 30.3%, P < 0.001). Within the 10 double-positive patients, mNGS matched culture results exactly in 5 cases, partially in 4 cases, and not at all in 1 case. In addition, mNGS detected a broader pathogen spectrum, detecting 26 species compared to only 5 species found in culture. The most abundant bacteria detected by mNGS was Escherichia coli, detected in 9 (27.2%) patients. All anaerobic bacteria, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and all mixed pathogens were detected by mNGS. The final clinical diagnosis of UTI was made in 25 cases, and the sensitivity of mNGS was significantly higher than culture (100.0% vs 40.0%; P < 0.001) when using the diagnosis as a reference standard; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value and specificity were 86.2%, 100% and 50.0%, respectively. Importantly, targeted antibiotic therapy based on mNGS resulted in significant improvement in urinalyses and urinary symptoms in patients.ConclusionsmNGS is a technology that has shown clear advantages over culture, particularly in the context of mixed infections and UTIs that are difficult to diagnose and treat. It helps to improve the detection of pathogens, guide changes in treatment strategies, and is an effective complement to urine culture.
“…Clinically, complicated UTIs are defined as those associated with factors that compromise the urinary tract or host defense, including urinary tract obstruction, immunosuppression, renal failure, and foreign bodies such as indwelling urinary catheters or other drainage devices (Lichtenberger and Hooton, 2008;Levison and Kaye, 2013). In our cases, the majority of patients had complicated UTI that showed recurrent, persistent and refractory features similar to the previous reports (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The applications of mNGS on non-sterile materials (e.g., urine) remains are still scarce and controversial. In one of the few recent studies on urine (Zhang et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022), a prospective proof-ofconcept study by Janes, V. A and colleagues confirmed the feasibility of metagenomic sequencing in detecting of urinary pathogens and drug resistance (Janes et al, 2022). We conducted a mNGS study in patients with suspected UTI and compared it with conventional test in terms of diagnostic performance, pathogenic findings to demonstrate its significance.…”
BackgroundMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising technology that allows unbiased pathogen detection and is increasingly being used for clinical diagnoses. However, its application in urinary tract infection (UTI) is still scarce.MethodsThe medical records of 33 patients with suspected UTI who were admitted to the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from March 2021 to July 2022 and received urine mNGS were retrospectively analyzed. The performance of mNGS and conventional urine culture in diagnosing infection and identifying causative organisms was compared, and the treatment effects were evaluated in terms of changes in urinalyses and urinary symptoms.ResultsIn the detection of bacteria and fungi, mNGS detected at least one pathogen in 29 (87.9%) cases, including 19 (57.6%) with positive mNGS but negative culture results and 10 (30.3%) with both mNGS and culture positive results. The remaining 4 (12.1%) patients were negative by both tests. Overall, mNGS performed better than culture (87.9% vs. 30.3%, P < 0.001). Within the 10 double-positive patients, mNGS matched culture results exactly in 5 cases, partially in 4 cases, and not at all in 1 case. In addition, mNGS detected a broader pathogen spectrum, detecting 26 species compared to only 5 species found in culture. The most abundant bacteria detected by mNGS was Escherichia coli, detected in 9 (27.2%) patients. All anaerobic bacteria, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and all mixed pathogens were detected by mNGS. The final clinical diagnosis of UTI was made in 25 cases, and the sensitivity of mNGS was significantly higher than culture (100.0% vs 40.0%; P < 0.001) when using the diagnosis as a reference standard; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value and specificity were 86.2%, 100% and 50.0%, respectively. Importantly, targeted antibiotic therapy based on mNGS resulted in significant improvement in urinalyses and urinary symptoms in patients.ConclusionsmNGS is a technology that has shown clear advantages over culture, particularly in the context of mixed infections and UTIs that are difficult to diagnose and treat. It helps to improve the detection of pathogens, guide changes in treatment strategies, and is an effective complement to urine culture.
“…Metagenomic techniques were used to successfully identify pathogens directly from patient specimens, including cerebrospinal fluid, 13 , 17-25 respiratory secretions, 26-31 skin and soft tissue or bone and joint tissues/synovial fluid, 32 , 34 heart valve tissue, 35 and urine. 36 A review of the methods sections revealed significant heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity of testing due to variability in study design, reference standards, clinical factors, and technical variation among the laboratories performing the testing. For exemplar US publications, laboratories of the University of California at San Francisco were featured prominently as testing laboratories.…”
To better identify emerging or reemerging pathogens in patients with difficult-to-diagnose infections, it is important to improve access to advanced molecular testing methods. This is particularly relevant for cases where conventional microbiologic testing has been unable to detect the pathogen and the patient's specimens test negative. To assess the availability and utility of such testing for human clinical specimens, a literature review of published biomedical literature was conducted. From a corpus of more than 4,000 articles, a set of 34 reports was reviewed in detail for data on where the testing was being performed, types of clinical specimens tested, pathogen agnostic techniques and methods used, and results in terms of potential pathogens identified. This review assessed the frequency of advanced molecular testing, such as metagenomic next generation sequencing that has been applied to clinical specimens for supporting clinicians in caring for difficult-to-diagnose patients. Specimen types tested were from cerebrospinal fluid, respiratory secretions, and other body tissues and fluids. Publications included case reports and series, and there were several that involved clinical trials, surveillance studies, research programs, or outbreak situations. Testing identified both known human pathogens (sometimes in new sites) and previously unknown human pathogens. During this review, there were no apparent coordinated efforts identified to develop regional or national reports on emerging or reemerging pathogens. Therefore, development of a coordinated sentinel surveillance system that applies advanced molecular methods to clinical specimens which are negative by conventional microbiological diagnostic testing would provide a foundation for systematic characterization of emerging and underdiagnosed pathogens and contribute to national biodefense strategy goals.
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an effective method that can be used for the identification of early pathogens in patients with suspected severe pneumonia. However, the potential of mNGS for evaluating the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with severe pneumonia remains unclear. In the present report, hospital-acquired gram-negative bacteria infections were detected in a case using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in a sample of bronchoalveolar fluid. This was obtained from a 58-year-old male patient with traumatic wet lung after a neurosurgery. According to the results, of which the profiles of the resistance genes were detected by mNGS, drugs designed to control infection were adjusted, namely to polymyxin B (500,000 U/12 h), azithromycin (0.5 g/24 h) and ganciclovir (0.25 g/12 h). Following adjusting treatment for 8 days, the symptoms of lung infection and hypoxemia were markedly improved, resulting in the patient being transferred out of the intensive care unit 15 days after treatment. To conclude, observations from the present report suggest that mNGS is a useful method for the early identification of pathogens in patients with pneumonia caused by ARDS. However, further studies are required to identify the complementary role of mNGS in supporting conventional microbiological methods in routine clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.