2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27782-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and pervasive diagenetic isotope exchange in foraminifera tests is species-dependent

Abstract: Oxygen isotope compositions of fossil foraminifera tests are commonly used proxies for ocean paleotemperatures, with reconstructions spanning the last 112 million years. However, the isotopic composition of these calcitic tests can be substantially altered during diagenesis without discernible textural changes. Here, we investigate fluid-mediated isotopic exchange in pristine tests of three modern benthic foraminifera species (Ammonia sp., Haynesina germanica, and Amphistegina lessonii) following immersion int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of isotopic exchange by both dissolution-precipitation and diffusion is expected to depend on calcite surface area. However, the observation of similar surface-area-normalized exchange rates between natural and synthetic calcite is inconsistent with previous studies that have reported differences in isotope exchange rates due to chemical or crystallographic differences between synthetic and natural calcite, and between abiotic and biogenic calcite (Chanda et al, 2019;Cisneros-Lazaro et al, 2022;Kronenberg et al, 1984;Lahav and Bolt, 1964). A difference in Ca isotope exchange rates between biogenic versus abiotic calcite in the study of Chanda et al (2019) could be attributed to the higher amount of chemical impurities in the biogenic calcite, facilitating greater dissolution and reprecipitation due to compositional differences between solid and fluid.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dissolution-precipitation Processescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The extent of isotopic exchange by both dissolution-precipitation and diffusion is expected to depend on calcite surface area. However, the observation of similar surface-area-normalized exchange rates between natural and synthetic calcite is inconsistent with previous studies that have reported differences in isotope exchange rates due to chemical or crystallographic differences between synthetic and natural calcite, and between abiotic and biogenic calcite (Chanda et al, 2019;Cisneros-Lazaro et al, 2022;Kronenberg et al, 1984;Lahav and Bolt, 1964). A difference in Ca isotope exchange rates between biogenic versus abiotic calcite in the study of Chanda et al (2019) could be attributed to the higher amount of chemical impurities in the biogenic calcite, facilitating greater dissolution and reprecipitation due to compositional differences between solid and fluid.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dissolution-precipitation Processescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to solid-state diffusion in single crystals, grain boundary diffusion of O is described by a diffusion coefficient that is ~20 orders of magnitude larger at 25°C (Farver and Yund, 1998), similar to those measured in low temperature studies. Similarly, the complex, interconnected porosity in foraminifera tests facilitate greater diffusive exchange between 18 Oenriched fluid and the solid compared to abiotic single calcite crystals (Cisneros-Lazaro et al, 2022). The lack of agreement between diffusion coefficients from experiments conducted at 25°C versus those at high temperatures for single crystals suggests that the higher diffusion coefficients at low temperatures may be attributable to the presence of fractures and 25 microporosity in the calcite and aqueous-mediated diffusion, possibly with some contribution of dissolution-precipitation, rather than a solid-state process alone.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Diffusive Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…can overlook the effects of early burial diagenesis in bioaragonite hard tissues. This means that many of the bioaragonite skeletons considered pristine and used in the reconstruction of the Earth past may have been altered despite not showing significant microstructural evidence of this alteration (Bernard et al, 2017;Cisneros-Lázaro et al, 2022). At this point, the question that arises is whether bioaragonite recrystallization into abiogenic aragonite impacts the geochemical signatures, particularly isotopic, and if so, to what extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%