2006
DOI: 10.1198/106186006x128551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Exact Simulation of Large Gaussian Lattice Systems in ℝ2: Exploring the Limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The random component, e(x, y), is described by a Gaussian distribution with mean equal to 1, and its standard deviation, s e [R R (x, y)], is a function of radar rainfall values and spatial and temporal correlation functions, r s (Ds) and r t (Dt), as described in section 2. In general, the simulation of Gaussian random variables correlated in space or time can be performed according to wellestablished techniques (see Gneiting et al [2005] for a review). However, the simulation of spatially and temporally correlated Gaussian random fields presents a much higher degree of complexity [e.g., Gneiting et al, 2007].…”
Section: Ensemble Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The random component, e(x, y), is described by a Gaussian distribution with mean equal to 1, and its standard deviation, s e [R R (x, y)], is a function of radar rainfall values and spatial and temporal correlation functions, r s (Ds) and r t (Dt), as described in section 2. In general, the simulation of Gaussian random variables correlated in space or time can be performed according to wellestablished techniques (see Gneiting et al [2005] for a review). However, the simulation of spatially and temporally correlated Gaussian random fields presents a much higher degree of complexity [e.g., Gneiting et al, 2007].…”
Section: Ensemble Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several methods have been proposed to generate correlated Gaussian random fields: matrix factorization, spectral turning bands, circulant embedding, and cutoff embedding [e.g., Mantoglou and Wilson, 1982;Davis, 1987;Dietrich and Newsam, 1993;Gneiting et al, 2005]. For our purpose, we selected the Cholesky decomposition method [e.g., Cressie, 1993], whose advantages include exactness (asymptotically, an ensemble of simulated field series has the correlation structure exactly as required) and an ability to account for the dependence of the variance on the given radar rainfall values to reproduce the estimated properties of the radar rainfall uncertainty model.…”
Section: Ensemble Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the circulant embedding method, which is both fast and exact, for the simulation of a profile or surface associated to a Gaussian RF with a given correlation function. The computational features of this method, for lattice processes in R 2 , are illustrated in a recent paper by Gneiting et al [15].…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In R, chol computes the upper-triangular matrix R. The computation has the same overall time complexity as eigenvector decomposition, namely O(M 3 N 3 ) for the decomposition (assuming a dense covariance matrix, see below), and then O(M 2 N 2 ) per sample (Golub and Van Loan 1989;Gneiting,Ševčíková, Percival, Schlather, and Jiang 2006). 5.…”
Section: Recover the Realization By Computing R Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no way to guarantee this in a given application, though Møller et al (1998) and Møller and Waagepetersen (2004) remark that this has rarely been a problem for them in practice, provided a suitable level of discretization is employed, comments supported by our experiences. Wood and Chan (1994) and these later works recommend choosing larger lattice extensions as a possible remedy in the event negative eigenvalues are encountered, while Gneiting et al (2006) explore the use of appropriately modified covariance functions.…”
Section: Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%