ASP-DAC 2004: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04EX753)
DOI: 10.1109/aspdac.2004.1337674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and efficient voltage scheduling by evolutionary slack distribution

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementing the parallelizing ACO-VTS and its approximation approach by C++ with MPI, we compare the results of the two algorithms operated on the Blade Server with EE-GLSA and ASG-VTS based on benchmarks tgff1-tgff25 used in [1,2,4,5]. These benchmarks are generated using TGFF [8], a tool producing pseudo-random task graphs, so it is quite practical in the real world.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing the parallelizing ACO-VTS and its approximation approach by C++ with MPI, we compare the results of the two algorithms operated on the Blade Server with EE-GLSA and ASG-VTS based on benchmarks tgff1-tgff25 used in [1,2,4,5]. These benchmarks are generated using TGFF [8], a tool producing pseudo-random task graphs, so it is quite practical in the real world.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evolutionary scheme to schedule DAGs on multiprocessors for minimizing the task completion time has been proposed in [6]. A fast and efficient task scheduling and voltage selection approach called Evolutionary Relative Slack Distribution Voltage Scheduling (ERSD-VS) has been introduced in [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further reduce the complexity of slack distribution, we introduce the notion of time-based relatives of a task (Section 4.2) as a heuristic that helps finding the candidates for slowdown and speedup quickly and efficiently. We compare our algorithm with two of the most energy efficient approaches: RVS [19] and EE-GLSA [15]. Experimental results from running publicly available tight-deadline benchmarks show that with only four modes to choose from, ASG-VTS can save up to 26% and 33% more energy compared to RVS and EE-GLSA.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ILP has a very long runtime, they have used a partitioning heuristic to compromise the optimality with the speed. In [19], a voltage selection technique (RVS) is proposed that randomly distributes the slack time among the high-power tasks over several iterations. It adjusts the ordering of tasks to make the selected modes schedulable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%