2023
DOI: 10.1364/ao.476939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and accurate centerline extraction algorithm for a laser stripe applied for shoe outsole inspection

Abstract: Line laser 3D reconstruction technology is widely used in industrial applications. As a key step of this technology, line laser midline extraction directly affects the accuracy of the 3D reconstructed model. In reconstructing the shoe outsole, the traditional algorithm based on the threshold method to determine the laser position may result in a large amount of information loss and miscellaneous point misjudgment owing to the irregularity of the shoe outsole surface, which critically affects the laser imaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed pruning algorithm has good effects in solving the problem of branching in the extracted laser stripe centers, effectively removing the influence of multiline laser center spots and greatly improving the extraction accuracy. Algorithm GCOG Steger's algorithm Proposed method Rao's algorithm 32 Sheng's algorithm 35 Depth value (mm) faster than Rao's algorithm and 2.2 times faster than Sheng's algorithm. The least amount of time is required to obtain the depth value of the medium-thick steel plates, and the fastest extraction speed can meet the real-time requirements of the industrial measurement system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed pruning algorithm has good effects in solving the problem of branching in the extracted laser stripe centers, effectively removing the influence of multiline laser center spots and greatly improving the extraction accuracy. Algorithm GCOG Steger's algorithm Proposed method Rao's algorithm 32 Sheng's algorithm 35 Depth value (mm) faster than Rao's algorithm and 2.2 times faster than Sheng's algorithm. The least amount of time is required to obtain the depth value of the medium-thick steel plates, and the fastest extraction speed can meet the real-time requirements of the industrial measurement system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment on laser stripe center extraction will be conducted from the perspectives of accuracy, applicability, and real-time performance. Choose the traditional GCOG, the Steger’s algorithm, Rao’s 32 algorithm, and Sheng’s 35 algorithm as comparative algorithms to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method in this paper.…”
Section: Experiments and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%