2009
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Accurate Alignment of Multiple Protein Networks

Abstract: Comparative analysis of protein networks has proven to be a powerful approach for elucidating network structure and predicting protein function and interaction. A fundamental challenge for the successful application of this approach is to devise an efficient multiple network alignment algorithm. Here we present a novel framework for the problem. At the heart of the framework is a novel representation of multiple networks that is only linear in their size as opposed to current exponential representations. Our a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case studies a) and b) we compared our method against three different global and local multiple network alignment algorithms: SMETANA [23], IsoRankN [22] and NetworkBLAST-M [19]. To our knowledge, the first two methods are the best global many-to-many aligners of two or more species, while NetworkBlast-M represents the state-of-the-art for the local alignment problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case studies a) and b) we compared our method against three different global and local multiple network alignment algorithms: SMETANA [23], IsoRankN [22] and NetworkBLAST-M [19]. To our knowledge, the first two methods are the best global many-to-many aligners of two or more species, while NetworkBlast-M represents the state-of-the-art for the local alignment problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared our system with a selected list of state-of-the-art methods such as SMETANA [23], IsoRank-N [22] and NetworkBlast-M [19]. The experimental results show that GASOLINE outperforms the compared systems yielding the best results in terms of both quality (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we did not use the newer implementations of NetworkBLAST and IsoRank (i.e. NetworkBLAST-M [51] and IsoRankN [52]), since they are intended for multiple network alignments, rather than pairwise comparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PathBlast family tools [9]–[12] are representative of heuristic approaches. NetworkBLAST-M [13], an improved version of NetworkBLAST [11], attempts to align two or more networks by greedily searching conserved regions. Graemlin 2.0 [14] considers phylogenetic relationships to infer a network, then optimizes the learned objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global algorithms compare entire node-and-edge structures among networks [7], [10], [14]–[16], [18], [20], whereas local algorithms identify local regions in networks that exhibit similar node and edge structures [9], [13]. HGA explores global algorithms to align a pair of networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%