Fast analysis of nine PAHs in beer by ultrasound-vortex-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction coupled with gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry

Russo, Mario Vincenzo; Avino, Pasquale; Perugini, Luisa; Notardonato, Ivan

doi:10.1039/c5ra24873f

Cited by 20 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These LODs are lower than those of other methods for determining PAHs in wine (0.1-2 ng L −1 ), 15 fruit-based soft drinks (0.3-15 ng L −1 ), 19 tea (0.1-50 ng L −1 ) 24 or beer (1.2-3.7 μg L −1 ). 32 The main advantages of the proposed method include the low volumes of organic solvents it requires thanks to its using a semi-automated SPE system, which also lowers the risk of contamination from the environment or the analyst. The high flexibility of the method allows the easy, rapid determination of PAHs in a wide range of drinks.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of semi‐automated continuous solid‐phase extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in alcoholic and non‐alcoholic drinks from Andalucía (Spain)

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The PAH levels in the four beer samples studied were lower than those in 11 samples from different countries analyzed by other authors: 80-2100 μg L −1 . 32 The wine samples also contained PAHs. None contained BaP.…”

Section: Quantification Of Pahs In Beveragesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of semi‐automated continuous solid‐phase extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in alcoholic and non‐alcoholic drinks from Andalucía (Spain)

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Actually, the best method is to centrifuge the solution and obtain the separation of the two phases; starting from 1 L, this procedure was difficult. The key already tested in previous papers [67,68] consisted of changing the solution polarity by salt addition. This event modified the ionic strength of the solution and supported the separation between the polar phase and the apolar phase.…”

Section: Evaluation Of the Extraction Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Method Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Phthalates and Bisphenol A Released from Plastic Water Containers

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phthalates (or phthalate esters, PAEs) and bisphenol A (BPA) are widely used in various industries, particularly in the fields of cosmetics and packaging, and they increase the malleability and workability of materials. As a result of their use, some international health organizations have begun to study them. In this study, the authors developed a methodology for the simultaneous determination of dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP); dibutyl phthalate (DBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP); di-n-octyl-phthalate (DnOP) and bisphenol A (BPA) from drinking and non-potable waters. The extraction of PAEs and BPA was performed using a solvent-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (SB-DLLME) method. The analytical determination was performed using a gas chromatography–ion trap mass spectrometry (GC-IT/MS) analysis. The entire procedure was validated as recoveries were studied according to the volume and the extraction solvent used, pH, and ionic strength. Dynamic linearity ranges and linear equations of all the compounds were experimentally determined as well as the limit of detection (LOD) (1–8 ng mL−1) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) (5–14 ng mL−1), reproducibility, and sensitivity. The method was applied to 15 water samples (mineral water and tap water) for determining PAEs and BPA released from the plastic container. After the release simulation, four PAEs (i.e., DiBP, DBP, DHEP, and DnOP) were determined at very low concentrations (below 1.2 ng mL−1) in two water samples from (sport) bottles.

show abstract

“…The study of Russo et al. with some modifications was used to validate the method studied in the present study [30]. Method validation in terms of linearity, LOD, LOQ, accuracy, and precision are reported in Text S3.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated ultrasound‐assisted magnetic solid‐phase extraction for efficient determination and pre‐concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from high‐consumption soft drinks and non‐alcoholic beers in Iran

Azari

Abtahi

Saeedi

et al. 2022

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present research, an ultrasound‐assisted magnetic solid‐phase extraction coupled with a gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry hybrid system was developed for the extraction/determination of trace amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in high‐consumption soft drinks and non‐alcoholic beers in Iran using magnetite graphene oxide adsorbent. The magnetite graphene oxide was characterized by scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and vibrating‐sample magnetometer techniques. The highest extraction recovery (73.05%–95.56%) and enrichment factor (90.65–106.38) were obtained at adsorbent mass: 10 mg, adsorption time: 30 min, salt addition: sodium chloride 10% w/v, desorption time: 20 min, eluent type: hexane: acetone (1:1, v/v), and desorption solvent volumes: 200 μl. Under optimum conditions, the linearity range for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons determination was 0.2–200 ng/ml with a coefficient of determination > 0.993, the limit of detection = 0.09–0.21 ng/ml, the limit of quantitation = 0.3–0.7 ng/ml, and relative standard deviation < 8.1%, respectively. Relative recoveries in spiked real samples ranged from 94.67 to 109.45% with a standard deviation < 6.05%. The proposed method is effective, sensitive, and reusable and it is promising for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons residues in environmental samples.

show abstract

Fast analysis of nine PAHs in beer by ultrasound-vortex-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction coupled with gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry

Abstract: An Ultrasound-Vortex-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Micro-Extraction (USVADLLME) procedure coupled with Gas Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry (GC-IT/MS) is proposed for the fast analysis of nine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in beer.

Cited by 20 publications

References 39 publications

Use of semi‐automated continuous solid‐phase extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in alcoholic and non‐alcoholic drinks from Andalucía (Spain)

Use of semi‐automated continuous solid‐phase extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in alcoholic and non‐alcoholic drinks from Andalucía (Spain)

A Method Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Phthalates and Bisphenol A Released from Plastic Water Containers

Integrated ultrasound‐assisted magnetic solid‐phase extraction for efficient determination and pre‐concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from high‐consumption soft drinks and non‐alcoholic beers in Iran

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About