2008
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2008.2004295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Affine Projection Algorithms for Filtered-x Multichannel Active Noise Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in the convergence speed without the computational demands of the RLS algorithm have been achieved using hybrid algorithms that combine the LMS and RLS adaptation methods [9], as well as through the use of affine projection based algorithms [10]. The computational problem associated with large-scale active noise control systems has also recently been addressed by exploiting the parallel processing provided by graphics processing units [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the convergence speed without the computational demands of the RLS algorithm have been achieved using hybrid algorithms that combine the LMS and RLS adaptation methods [9], as well as through the use of affine projection based algorithms [10]. The computational problem associated with large-scale active noise control systems has also recently been addressed by exploiting the parallel processing provided by graphics processing units [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], efficient versions of the FAP algorithm that incur low computational loads are developed. However, the recursive approach used for matrix inversion does not present any improvement over the original version for low projection orders and adaptive filters with few coefficients, and therefore, it is a good option only for long-length filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such modifications result in better final errors in the steady state, but the computational cost remains the same; furthermore, most of these proposals are intended for acoustic echo canceler applications [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn restricts the efficacy of ANC to frequencies less than half of its sampling frequency. A number of researchers have shown interest in developing computationally efficient algorithms, otherwise known as fast ANC algorithms [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. A class of fast ANC algorithms known as the block algorithm, which exploits frequency-domain convolution and correlation operations, has been shown to achieve a significant computational advantage over its conventional time-domain counterpart [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%