2011
DOI: 10.1002/nav.20464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fashion products with asymmetric sales horizons

Abstract: Abstract:In this study, we explore an inventory model for a wholesaler who sells a fashion product through two channels with asymmetric sales horizons. The wholesaler can improve profitability by employing joint procurement and inventory reallocation as a recourse action in response to the dynamics of sales. In this research, a simple stochastic programming model is analyzed to specify the properties of the optimal inventory decisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cachon and Swinney (2011) reveal that fast fashion systems of a product can significantly increase the profit of a firm by combining quick response and enhanced design. Wu and Chiang (2011) analyze a simple stochastic programming model to explore the inventory of a wholesaler who sells a fashion product through two channels with asymmetric sales horizons. Caro and Gallien (2012) design and implement a process relying on a formal forecasting model which increases fast-fashion retailers' clearance revenues by approximately 6%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cachon and Swinney (2011) reveal that fast fashion systems of a product can significantly increase the profit of a firm by combining quick response and enhanced design. Wu and Chiang (2011) analyze a simple stochastic programming model to explore the inventory of a wholesaler who sells a fashion product through two channels with asymmetric sales horizons. Caro and Gallien (2012) design and implement a process relying on a formal forecasting model which increases fast-fashion retailers' clearance revenues by approximately 6%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%