2008
DOI: 10.3129/i07-181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fasanella—Servat procedure: indications, efficacy, and complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
24
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent large study showed an average MRD1 elevation of 2mm after undergoing a Fasanella-Servat procedure [2]. However, some patients in our series showed a large post-operative MRD1 improvement of >3-4mm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent large study showed an average MRD1 elevation of 2mm after undergoing a Fasanella-Servat procedure [2]. However, some patients in our series showed a large post-operative MRD1 improvement of >3-4mm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Conventionally, the Fasanella-Servat operation has been employed for minimal ptosis with good levator function, and this is reflected in the published literature regarding outcomes of the Fasanella-Servat procedure [1][2][3][4][5]7,10]. We were curious regarding the utility of this operation in patients with moderate to severe ptosis, and we hereby present our experience with the Fasanella-Servat surgical repair of blepharoptosis in these patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Postoperative problems included dry eye symptoms (6/144 patients), contour abnormalities in 12 lids, and dermatochalasis in 10 lids. [15] In our study we also noted that maximum number of patients operated for Levator Resection and Sling surgery also achieved and maintained either a good or fair surgical outcome 6 months postoperatively. 2 patients (6.67%) in the Silicon sling surgery group had poor correction and these were taken up for resurgery.…”
Section: Typementioning
confidence: 64%
“…5,8 Accordingly, respondent ASOPRS members appeared to take a relatively conservative approach to the issue, with only 53.4% of respondents not utilizing preoperative Schirmer testing. As might be expected, the majority of physicians performed some form of dry eye testing preoperatively, with 84.5% of surgeons that did not perform Schirmer testing utilizing some other form of dry eye evaluation preoperatively.…”
Section: K Aakalu and P Setabutrmentioning
confidence: 94%