FAS4M – No more: “Please mind the gap!”

Grundel, Martin; Abulawi, Jutta; Moeser, Georg; Weilkiens, Tim; Scheithauer, Axel; Kleiner, Sven; Kramer, Christoph; Neubert, Michael; Kümpel, Stephan; Albers, Albert

doi:10.3139/9783446443761.007

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To enhance the challenging applicability of the SysML, for the model-based product development methods FAS4M [15,16], SYSMOD [17], and SPES [18] the domain-specific modeling languages MechML [15,16,19], SYSMOD [20], and SPESML [21] exist. The notation and syntax of these domain-specific modeling languages is defined on the basis of the established SysML resp.…”

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the help of these mechanisms, refinements of UML, such as SysML, can be implemented as profiles in MBSE tools. Domain-specific modeling languages MechML [15,16,19], SYSMOD [20] and SPESML [21] use these mechanisms to further specify SysML resp. UML for the devel-K opment of mechatronic systems and thus make the notation and syntax more comprehensible for the user.…”

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Modeling language for the function-oriented development of mechatronic systems with motego

Spütz

Jacobs

Zerwas

et al. 2023

Forsch Ingenieurwes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As mechatronic products gain in popularity, methods for mastering the complexity of these systems in development become increasingly relevant, such as model-based systems engineering (MBSE). Main pillars of MBSE are method, language and tool. A method specifies procedures in product development. The application of the method is supported by a language and tool as the language specifies a system of symbols with which development artifacts can be represented in a software environment (i.e. tool). Currently, various MBSE methods exist, such as motego. Motego specifies a framework for the function-oriented seamless development of mechatronic systems from requirements to the physical realization down to mechanical and electrical contacts and the description of these via parameters and models. Central element in MBSE is the system model, which connects all relevant development artefacts. The system model is created with a language in a software environment such as Cameo Systems Modeler. In MBSE, the graphical systems modeling language SysML is widely established. The language elements in SysML are very abstract and numerous. As a result, the language is difficult to apply. However, its reasonable applicability is an essential prerequisite for the introduction of the motego methods in industrial practice. This results in the following research need: A specific modeling language for the motego method is needed that supports its reasonable application. Therefore, in this paper a modeling language is presented whose language elements are specifically adapted to the motego method. With the help of this domain specific language, the user is guided through method-compliant modeling.

show abstract

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling language for the function-oriented development of mechatronic systems with motego

Spütz

Jacobs

Zerwas

et al. 2023

Forsch Ingenieurwes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By creating an interdisciplinary system model, all information arising in the development process are managed centrally (Deißenböck et al, 2010;Gausemeier et al, 2013). Even though the application of MBSE in the product development process is currently the subject of intensive research, its use in the industry has not been widely spread so far (Eigner et al, 2017;Grundel et al, 2014). Beyond that, there is currently no consideration of high variety product portfolios within MBSE, despite the claim to a complete product description (Weilkiens, 2011).…”

Section: Motivation and Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Model-Based Product Configuration of High Variety Product Portfolios

Wyrwich

Jacobs

Siebrecht

et al. 2020

Proc. Des. Soc.: Des. Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facing a rising competitive pressure, manufactures create advantages when they are able to offer customer-specific products to the conditions of a mass production article. Traditional configurators support the creation of personalized products from the elements of a modular product system, but are based on a pre-defined set of rules. The model based approach changes the environment of configuration from static configuration rules to the dependencies defined within the product's system model. So, by regarding target quantities of the user, the configurator identifies the optimal variant.

show abstract

“…Includes physical layer how Alt, Oliver [21] Allocation relationships (<<allocate>>) Analogous to SysML (system breakdown, system elements) FAS-Method [22] Relationship matrix "allocate" link according SysML FAS4M [23] Federative system model Explicit modelling of physical elements in connection to CAD-models Harmony-SE [24] Trace links within/between tools, <<satisfy>> Analogous to SysML (system breakdown, system elements) Hold & Perry [25] Traceability view: trace, refine, validate Analogous to SysML (system breakdown, system elements) OOSEM [17] Process, relationships in matrix (derive, satisfy, verify, refine, trace, copy), functional allocation Explicit modelling of physical node architecture incl. SW-HW-dataarchitecture SE-VPE [19] Allocation matrices; approach to integrate functional SysML artifacts in PLM systems Only M-CAD, no dependencies for E-CAD and CAE, no dependencies on property level SPES [26] Relations between different viewpoints and abstraction layers by dint of allocation links.…”

Section: Supports Traceability Viamentioning

confidence: 99%

How the Blockchain fosters E/E traceability for MBSE and PLM in distributed engineering collaboration

Heber

Groll

2018

2018 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research paper is to describe how the Blockchain technology can foster traceability of electric/electronics (E/E) information artifacts in product lifecycle management (PLM) with a focus on bridging the gap between model-bases systems engineering (MBSE) and product data management (PDM). Due to automotive development includes many parties, such as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), suppliers, and new partners, a distribution mechanism for proclamation of changed information artifacts is necessary. The approach compares MBSE methods and identifies which information artifacts created there have to be linked with PDM artifacts. Practical implications for the exchange of data in engineering collaboration with multiple partners are assessed by a first proof of concept with a Blockchain prototype tested with a supplier. The originality of this approach stems from the application of the Blockchain technology in engineering IT, a meta data model to connect MBSE and PDM, and the facilitated inclusion of engineering collaboration partners by those means.

show abstract

FAS4M – No more: “Please mind the gap!”

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Modeling language for the function-oriented development of mechatronic systems with motego

Modeling language for the function-oriented development of mechatronic systems with motego

Model-Based Product Configuration of High Variety Product Portfolios

How the Blockchain fosters E/E traceability for MBSE and PLM in distributed engineering collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About