2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13690-017-0248-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farming, Q fever and public health: agricultural practices and beyond

Abstract: Since the Neolithic period, humans have domesticated herbivores to have food readily at hand. The cohabitation with animals brought various advantages that drastically changed the human lifestyle but simultaneously led to the emergence of new epidemics. The majority of human pathogens known so far are zoonotic diseases and the development of both agricultural practices and human activities have provided new dynamics for transmission. This article provides a general overview of some factors that influence the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e research by De Rooij et al [17] suggested that during any future epidemics, attention should be placed on a rapid source of identification, quantification of emission, accurate data collection, and smooth data exchange amongst relevant actors to enable effective risk assessment and risk management. Mori and Roest [18] pointed out that in achieving an effective control and management, there should be collective expertise from other scientific disciplines and stakeholder so that the expectations of farmers and the wider community can be met on the spread of the disease. Courcoul et al [19] used the Bayesian approach to obtain key epidemiological parameters from field data and suggested that the values of the parameters obtained can be used to provide information for calibrating simulation models to assess control strategies for C. burnetii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e research by De Rooij et al [17] suggested that during any future epidemics, attention should be placed on a rapid source of identification, quantification of emission, accurate data collection, and smooth data exchange amongst relevant actors to enable effective risk assessment and risk management. Mori and Roest [18] pointed out that in achieving an effective control and management, there should be collective expertise from other scientific disciplines and stakeholder so that the expectations of farmers and the wider community can be met on the spread of the disease. Courcoul et al [19] used the Bayesian approach to obtain key epidemiological parameters from field data and suggested that the values of the parameters obtained can be used to provide information for calibrating simulation models to assess control strategies for C. burnetii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People whose occupations involve close livestock contact (e.g. abattoir workers, livestock transporters and veterinarians) are considered at highest risk of infection (Graves & Islam, 2016; Karagiannis et al., 2009; Mori & Roest, 2018; Van der Hoek et al., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In southeastern Brazil, Mares-Guia et al (2014) found 66.6% seropositivity in sheep and 50% seropositivity in goats in the state of Rio de Janeiro. According to Mori & Roest (2018), vaginal swabs samples from cows that aborted within 8 days should preferably be collected aiming at the direct detection of C. burnetii by PCR. However, if the abortion occurred a longer time ago or if there is any history of reproductive problem in the herd, serologic tests can be used to verify if there was any contact with C. burnetii in the herd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%