2000
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15.22.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farming practices and the respiratory health risks of swine confinement buildings

Abstract: This study investigated whether clean swine confinement buildings (SCB) are less harmful to the respiratory system than older and dirtier facilities.Eight healthy volunteers were exposed for 4 h, at 1 week intervals, to eight SCB representing the widest possible range of cleanliness. Each volunteer and a technician rated the SCB for cleanliness from 1±10, 1 being the cleanest possible. Airborne dust, bacteria, endotoxin levels, molds, and ammonia were measured. For each volunteer measured, before and after eac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In these facilities, the mean ¡ SD values of total dust were 2.9 ¡ 0.9 mg?m -3 , mean values of endotoxin were #11,400 EU?m -3 ¡ 0.9 mg?m -3 and mean ¡ SD values of ammonia were 11.3 ¡ 4.2 ppm. Despite the case subjects working in newer barns, the current authors have no reason to believe that the exposures for these cases were substantially different than those previously described, as newer facilities have been shown to have at least the same levels of exposure as the older facilities [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these facilities, the mean ¡ SD values of total dust were 2.9 ¡ 0.9 mg?m -3 , mean values of endotoxin were #11,400 EU?m -3 ¡ 0.9 mg?m -3 and mean ¡ SD values of ammonia were 11.3 ¡ 4.2 ppm. Despite the case subjects working in newer barns, the current authors have no reason to believe that the exposures for these cases were substantially different than those previously described, as newer facilities have been shown to have at least the same levels of exposure as the older facilities [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…o8 h q.d.) have exposure to substances at similar or greater levels than those described for older, smaller family-operated facilities [18]. Asthma has been reported in swine farmers, but after long-term exposure [2,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of the outer cell wall of gram-negative bacteria, is a PAMP recognized by the PRR Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Although important, LPS levels are not consistently associated with inflammatory outcomes in swine confinement workers (6,35,43), and mice deficient in TLR4 signaling are not completely protected against swine barn air-induced airway inflammation (5). Recent molecular biology techniques show that bioaerosols in animal environments are dominated by an incredibly diverse population of gram-positive bacteria (10,25,26,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High airborne bacterial aerosols concentrations (up to 10 5 colony-forming units [CFU]/m 3 ) for nasal breathing exposure were found in a swine confinement building investigation in Canada Cormier et al, 2000). There was 2.8 Â 10 4 CFU/m 3 of respirable airborne microorganisms recovered when Predicala et al studied the bioaerosols concentration in the swine finishing barns (Predicala et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%