Farmers’ Preference for Participating in Rural Solid Waste Management: A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China

Abstract

Rural solid waste management is an important method to improve rural living environments. Farmers’ participation in rural solid waste management plays an essential role in sustainable waste management. Based on the micro-survey data of 592 farmers in Shaanxi province, a multinomial logit model was applied to explore farmers’ preferences for participating in rural solid waste management. The empirical results show that both institutional and interpersonal trust have significant positive effects on farmers’ payment participation, and labor and payment participation. Among environmental awareness, farmers with pro-environmental behavior prefer labor participation, and labor and payment participation; the more environmental knowledge farmers have, the stronger their preferences for payment participation, labor and payment participation, and labor participation; farmers concerned about environmental problems are more inclined to adopt labor and payment participation or payment participation. For socio-demographic characteristics, gender has no significant influence, while agricultural net income and education can significantly increase farmers’ willingness to participate; farmers who have migrant work experience prefer to participate in payment; there are obvious intergenerational differences in the influence of social trust and environmental awareness on farmers’ participation preference. Therefore, providing diversified participation modes, creating a good social trust environment, and enhancing farmers’ awareness of environmental care are important in promoting rural solid waste management.

Social tipping and climate change: The moderating role of social capital in bridging the gap between awareness and action

“…These findings are in line with other research that indicates that IT is associated with a greater willingness to make economic sacrifices for the environment and with less frequent informal EB, but it is unrelated to formal behaviour (Taniguchi & Marshall, 2018). Also, individuals in countries with higher GT averages are less willing to sacrifice for the environment, and those in countries with higher averages of IT are more willing to do so (Jönsson, 2020;Moon, 2017;Taniguchi & Marshall, 2018;Wu et al, 2022). Thus, low IT can hinder pro-environmental behaviours and sustainability efforts.…”

“…In the same vein, the H1.2, the interactions between CCA, quality-of-life perceptions, IT and EB are complex and multifaceted. While IT appears to play a critical role in reinforcing the positive impact of CCA on quality-of-life perceptions and encouraging financial contributions to environmental causes, the literature also suggests that the dynamics of trust and environmental action can vary significantly across contexts and individual motivations (Wu et al, 2022). Researchers argue that high levels of institutional distrust may not necessarily discourage EB if individuals are motivated by strong personal norms or scepticism towards institutions leads them to take matters into their own hands.…”