2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmers’ exposure to herbicides in North Italy: Assessment under real-life conditions in small-size rice and corn farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by the above-mentioned previous study (34), real values of exposure to pesticides are not always easily predictable. A recent study conducted in France, the PESTEXPO study (40), highlighted workers' specific tasks as another important determinant regarding exposure to pesticides.…”
Section: Pesticide Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As suggested by the above-mentioned previous study (34), real values of exposure to pesticides are not always easily predictable. A recent study conducted in France, the PESTEXPO study (40), highlighted workers' specific tasks as another important determinant regarding exposure to pesticides.…”
Section: Pesticide Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this regard, a study performed in northern Italy (34) provided some interesting evidence. The study was conducted on 11 rice and 13 maize farms in Lombardy (Italy), which had a small number of workers (3 or 4), and participated in the study with one worker only, who was in charge for pesticides application.…”
Section: Pesticide Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the converse, no excess risk emerged in association with overall agricultural crops or other specific crop types. Our a priori hypothesis was that for children living adjacent to cultivated fields, passive exposure to drift of the pesticides used for the specific crop types was not negligible (Lu et al, 2000; Rubino et al, 2012). We selected a 100-meter buffer around homes since it represents the distance where substantial pesticide drift occurs according to some studies (Wittich and Siebers, 2002; Siebers et al, 2003; Martin, 2008; Wolters et al, 2008; Cornelis et al, 2009; Garron et al, 2009), taking into account that in Italy agricultural fields are sprayed only by ground-based devices and therefore larger drifts are difficult to assume (Tsakirakis et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dermal exposure was assessed by the use of pads and the coordinated collection of the hand wash liquid. Body exposure was assessed using square 0.01 m 2 lab-made pads prepared with filter paper (Whatman no.1 filter paper, Prodotti Gianni, Milan) as previously described OECD, 1997;Rubino et al, 2012). Pads were applied on six representative body districts, namely: right upper limb (arm + right forearm), left upper limb (arm + left forearm), front trunk (thorax + abdomen), rear trunk (back + loin), right lower limb (thigh + right shin), and left lower limb (thigh + left shin).…”
Section: Dermal Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%