2016
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2016.11906991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmer Perceptions on Empowerment Programs by the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Gauteng Province, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes were noticeable in the business operations, the influence beneficiaries had in their communities and the changes beneficiaries saw within themselves. Similarly, Nesamvuni, et al (2016), a study investing the perceptions of farmers supported by empowerment programs by the Gauteng DARD, found that farmers had positive perceptions of benefits received from support interventions. Majority of the farmers benefitted from receiving infrastructure, agricultural inputs and goods.…”
Section: Perceived Outcome Of Services Provided By the Ada To Beneficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outcomes were noticeable in the business operations, the influence beneficiaries had in their communities and the changes beneficiaries saw within themselves. Similarly, Nesamvuni, et al (2016), a study investing the perceptions of farmers supported by empowerment programs by the Gauteng DARD, found that farmers had positive perceptions of benefits received from support interventions. Majority of the farmers benefitted from receiving infrastructure, agricultural inputs and goods.…”
Section: Perceived Outcome Of Services Provided By the Ada To Beneficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Soft infrastructure touches on the power role of community members, especially in understanding the characteristics of citizens and encouraging empowerment, not only in urban areas but in rural areas with the main activity being agriculture (Nesamvuni et al, 2016). Another side of power that is closely related to soft infrastructure is related to conflicting policy preferences, resource allocation, and administrative tensions (Dolšak & Prakash, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%