Farmer knowledge across the commodification spectrum: Rice, cotton, and vegetables in Telangana, India

Abstract

Crop seeds are a factor of production that can be produced on farm or bought, commodified in varying ways and degrees, and that can change slowly or rapidly—all of which directly impact the crucial process of farmer “skilling.” Seed choices also offer a unique empirical window through which farmer knowledge may be studied. Although other studies have examined the differences between cash and food crops, this research provides new insights into varyingly commodified crops within the same agrarian system. When planting rice, genetically modified hybrid cotton seeds, and garden vegetables, farmers in Telangana, India, face different constraints and opportunities to learn about their seeds and practice that knowledge in the field. These differences arise from agronomic properties of the seeds themselves as well as from the sociocultural meaning that structures the context in which farmers buy, grow, and save them. This measurable discrepancy in farmer knowledge and experience presents an opportunity to examine the variable impact of seed commodification as it is experienced by the same group of farmers across several different crops. Building on theories of commodification and agricultural knowledge, we propose that the different ways in which farmer knowledge operates in these crops reflect a spectrum on which knowledge and commodification are inversely related.

On Pickles: Biological and Sociocultural Links Between Fermented Foods and the Human Gut Microbiome

“…And depending on how much money you have in your wallet you have more choices, but I just feel like food is so much deeper than that." It is beyond the scope of this paper to review the scholarly literature on the ways in which food is and is not a capitalist commodity (73)(74)(75)(76), but ethnobiologists and agrarian studies scholars recognize the transformative effects of practice on knowledge and identity (77,78).…”

Competing fields in sustainable agriculture: on farmer-expert understandings of good farming, good farmers and organic farming

“…These problems may be difficult but can be solved by the same measures that lead to the asymmetry: the farmers must learn to catch up with the expert or where the expert must move into the farmer's field of practice in order to better understand their epistemic location (Noe et al, 2015). For instance, Flachs and Stone (2019) have introduced the commodification spectrum as the intersections of managers, knowledge, and seeds in different crops on Telangana farms. On the most commodified edge are the experts and managers of plant stations and input companies.…”

Situating Political Agronomy: The Knowledge Politics of Hybrid Rice in India and Uganda

“…Faced with a growing and shifting array of commercial paddy varieties, most farmers have scant opportunity to develop an experientially based understanding of the relative attributes of different varieties. Instead, farmers tend to either remain true to trusted older varieties — some of which date back to the original Green Revolution period — or to rely on outside sources of information, including neighbours, input dealers and extension agents, to make seed choices (Flachs and Stone, 2019).…”