Farmer interest in joint venture structures in the Australian broadacre grains sector

Abstract

There is a growing productivity gap between leading and average grain farms in Australia, driven by a combination of constraints that limit the adoption of innovations. Such constraints may be overcome by the adoption of organizational innovations, including collaborative structures such as joint venture (JV) arrangements. Given the predominance of the owner‐operator family farm model in the Australian grains sector, organizational innovations have largely been overlooked by the research and extension community. This paper examines business alliance formation in agriculture and farmer perceptions of, interest in, and barriers to participation in JV structures. A telephone survey of 573 Australian grain growers revealed that 3% of farmers had adopted a JV structure and that such farms were significantly more likely to have a larger crop area and be less diversified compared to nonadopters. Another 21% of farmers expressed an interest in adopting a JV structure in the future, particularly to reduce costs and improve productivity. A multinomial logit model showed that such farmers were significantly different for a number of sociodemographic variables including age and education, when compared to farmers not interested in adopting JV structures. To build on this basis of interest and motivation for innovative farm business structures, further understanding of perceived trade‐offs and preferences is needed to identify the most attractive JV designs. [EconLit Citation: Q13].

Farmers' choice between endogenous vs. exogenous e-commerce: alignment with resources and performance goals

“…Academic studies show that cooperatives have become a solid model for the economic development and modernization of agriculture (Wang et al , 2019; Zeng et al , 2019). There are a multitude of benefits for farmers associated with membership in cooperatives, ranging from achieving scale economies (Lynch et al , 2018), gaining training, support, and greater access to market information (Zheng et al , 2018), higher bargaining power (Warman and Kennedy, 1998), lower trading costs (Royer, 1995), and lower trade risk (MacDonald et al , 2004), through which greater market expansion can be accomplished. Also, studies show that increased trust and commitment in a cooperative can result in higher income and cost reductions for farmers (Fu et al , 2013).…”

Machinery utilization and management organization in Japanese rice farms: Comparison of single‐family, multifamily, and community farms

“…However, with the nuclear family becoming more commonplace in Japan, multifamily farms are usually formed for joint use of farm machinery by nonrelative households. In other words, neighboring farms are merging to form joint farms, which will enable them to obtain land and labor and, thereby, improve farm machines’ operating rates (Larsén, 2010; Lynch, Llewellyn, Umberger, & Kragt, 2018). From the point of transaction costs, it is usually easier to enhance scale by continuing with the existing leasing relationships than for each farmer to build relationships with individual landowners (Takahashi, 2010).…”

Socio-psychological and management drivers explain farm level wheat yield gaps in Australia

“…Familyowned and -operated farms are predominant in the Australian grains sector. While there is a growing trend towards joint venture or corporate farm ownership structures (Lynch et al 2017), it is unclear if and how this trend is likely to impact farm productivity.…”