Abstract:The production and consumption of coffee are increasing despite the roadblocks to its agriculture and global trade. The unique, refreshing, and stimulating final cupping quality of coffee is the only reason for this rising production and consumption. Coffee quality is a multifaceted trait and is inevitably influenced by the way it is successively processed after harvesting. Reportedly, 60% of the quality attributes of coffee are governed by postharvest processing. The current review elaborates and establishes … Show more
“…The “washed” and “depulped” coffee showed the greatest similarity, although it was the “washed” coffee that presented significantly superior values in the black currant‐like note ( p < .05) of the beverage bouquet. This might be due to the incorporation of tannins and acids to the bean during the washing process as reported by Hameed et al (). Whereas the “depulped” coffee sample only significantly stood out due to the fresh butter note ( p < .05) in the bouquet, which could be due to the fact that this process favors butyric fermentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Hundred kilogram of coffee fruit of the “Garnica” variety, cultivated at 1,330 m above sea level in the region of Huatusco in Veracruz (Mexico) were used as raw material. The said fruit was subjected to four postharvest processes, which have been described in the review carried out by Hameed et al (): (a) “Natural” process: the fruits were only dried; (b) Depulping process: the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and the bean with the adhered mesocarp was dried; (c) “Fermentation” process (this is an innovation): the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and, after being left to rest for 24 hr at room temperature, the beans were then dried; (d) “Washing” process: the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and, after being left to rest for 24 hr at room temperature, the beans were washed to eliminate the mesocarp and were then dried. A solar dryer was utilized to dehydrate the beans to 12% humidity in all of the processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundred kilogram of coffee fruit of the "Garnica" variety, cultivated at 1,330 m above sea level in the region of Huatusco in Veracruz (Mexico) were used as raw material. The said fruit was subjected to four postharvest processes, which have been described in the review carried out by Hameed et al (2018): (a) "Natural" process: the fruits were only dried;…”
Evaluating how the postharvest processes of coffee influence the sensory characteristics of the obtained beverage makes it possible to innovate to satisfy niche markets, increase cost–benefit advantages, and comply with environmental and quality standards. In this study, four postharvest processes (“natural,” “depulping,” “fermenting,” and “washing”) were carried out on the “Garnica” variety coffee fruit. The beverage resulting from each process underwent a sensory evaluation by (a) expert cuppers to characterize it with a descriptive analysis, as well as by (b) consumers to find out its overall acceptance. The red wine bouquet of the beverage, as obtained through the “natural” process, conditioned the overall acceptance of consumers, and the acceptance of the other coffees was conditioned by the fragrance having a note of lemon. The “depulping” and “fermentation” processes represented viable options to the “washed” coffee: These processes resulted in similar sensory characteristics and general acceptance but had a lower environmental impact. With an acceptance map from a multiple factor analysis of the sensory and hedonistic data, it was found that, when applied to Garnica variety coffee, the “depulping” process represents a viable option to replace “washed” coffee processing.
Practical applications
The results obtained allow for the presentation of information about the possibility of transitioning to postharvest processes that represent an alternative to the traditional “washed” method for the agents and organisms that manage the coffee sector to raise awareness among them. These results also offer information to consumers regarding the existence of other coffee options with similar sensory characteristics to “washed” coffee, but which have a lower environmental impact.
“…The “washed” and “depulped” coffee showed the greatest similarity, although it was the “washed” coffee that presented significantly superior values in the black currant‐like note ( p < .05) of the beverage bouquet. This might be due to the incorporation of tannins and acids to the bean during the washing process as reported by Hameed et al (). Whereas the “depulped” coffee sample only significantly stood out due to the fresh butter note ( p < .05) in the bouquet, which could be due to the fact that this process favors butyric fermentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Hundred kilogram of coffee fruit of the “Garnica” variety, cultivated at 1,330 m above sea level in the region of Huatusco in Veracruz (Mexico) were used as raw material. The said fruit was subjected to four postharvest processes, which have been described in the review carried out by Hameed et al (): (a) “Natural” process: the fruits were only dried; (b) Depulping process: the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and the bean with the adhered mesocarp was dried; (c) “Fermentation” process (this is an innovation): the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and, after being left to rest for 24 hr at room temperature, the beans were then dried; (d) “Washing” process: the exocarp of the fruit was eliminated and, after being left to rest for 24 hr at room temperature, the beans were washed to eliminate the mesocarp and were then dried. A solar dryer was utilized to dehydrate the beans to 12% humidity in all of the processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundred kilogram of coffee fruit of the "Garnica" variety, cultivated at 1,330 m above sea level in the region of Huatusco in Veracruz (Mexico) were used as raw material. The said fruit was subjected to four postharvest processes, which have been described in the review carried out by Hameed et al (2018): (a) "Natural" process: the fruits were only dried;…”
Evaluating how the postharvest processes of coffee influence the sensory characteristics of the obtained beverage makes it possible to innovate to satisfy niche markets, increase cost–benefit advantages, and comply with environmental and quality standards. In this study, four postharvest processes (“natural,” “depulping,” “fermenting,” and “washing”) were carried out on the “Garnica” variety coffee fruit. The beverage resulting from each process underwent a sensory evaluation by (a) expert cuppers to characterize it with a descriptive analysis, as well as by (b) consumers to find out its overall acceptance. The red wine bouquet of the beverage, as obtained through the “natural” process, conditioned the overall acceptance of consumers, and the acceptance of the other coffees was conditioned by the fragrance having a note of lemon. The “depulping” and “fermentation” processes represented viable options to the “washed” coffee: These processes resulted in similar sensory characteristics and general acceptance but had a lower environmental impact. With an acceptance map from a multiple factor analysis of the sensory and hedonistic data, it was found that, when applied to Garnica variety coffee, the “depulping” process represents a viable option to replace “washed” coffee processing.
Practical applications
The results obtained allow for the presentation of information about the possibility of transitioning to postharvest processes that represent an alternative to the traditional “washed” method for the agents and organisms that manage the coffee sector to raise awareness among them. These results also offer information to consumers regarding the existence of other coffee options with similar sensory characteristics to “washed” coffee, but which have a lower environmental impact.
“…The initial post-harvest processing steps have a significant role in ensuring the safe changes of the perishable coffee cherries into moderately stable green coffee beans. These green coffee beans have a moisture content of 10-12% to avoid undesired fermentation [5]. The popularity of the coffee product is associated with its distinctive organoleptic properties.…”
Coffee is one of the most important agricultural commodities in the world. The coffee quality is associated with pre-harvest and post-harvest management activities. Each step starting from selecting the best coffee variety for plantation until the final coffee drink preparation determines the cupping quality. The overall coffee quality influenced by the factors which involve in changes the physicochemical properties and sensorial attributes, including the post-harvest operations. The postharvest processing activities contribute about 60% of the quality of green coffee beans. The post-harvest operations include pulping, processing, drying, hulling, cleaning, sorting, grading, storage, roasting, grinding, and cupping. This chapter comprises the harvest and post-harvest operations of coffee and their impacts on coffee quality.
“…The cultivation of Coffea canephora Pierre ex Froehner has great importance for Brazil, having great historical and socio-economic value, and this primary product is considered one of the most important commodities traded by the country (Conab, 2019). A variety of environmental factors along the cultivation and post-harvest processes can influence the physical-chemical characteristics of coffee, such as water availability, irradiation over fruits, temperature fluctuation, nutritional management, phytosanitary treatment, canopy architecture, harvest method, drying process, storage conditions and preparation (Borém et al, 2008;Flambeau and Yoon, 2018;Hameed et al, 2018;Pimenta et al, 2018). Many of these factors can be managed to preserve the quality of the product, and the post-harvest processes are particularly important in this regard, as they tend to have a direct effect over the final traits of the coffee beans (Coradi et al, 2007).…”
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different drying methods (regarding temperature and drying time) over the seed moisture and germination of seeds of <em>Coffea canephora</em>, harvested from genotypes of late maturation. For this end, seeds from selected genotypes were harvested and dried using two different methods: drying at 25 ˚C with natural circulation of air and drying at 35 ˚C with artificial circulation of air. The seeds were evaluated to quantify the loss of moisture content, and their germinative potential was assessed by parameters of germination speed, and the proportion of seedlings with healthy germination originated from them. The results show it is possible to apply different drying methods; using different systems, temperatures and times of exposure; to decrease the moisture content of seeds of <em>C. canephora</em>, from 50% (freshly harvested seeds from genotypes of late maturation, in July) to under 18% (dried seeds). Even if the initial stages of the drying process, while the seeds still present high moisture content, are similar for both methods, the method with artificial circulation of air at 35 ˚C promotes the drying speed and is able to achieve the lower levels of seed moisture using less than half of the time required by method with natural circulation of air at 25 ˚C. This faster moisture removal, however, has negative impacts over the germinative potential of the seeds, which are not observed for seeds subjected to the slow natural drying.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.