2014
DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2014.982081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm Size and Returns to Cultivation in India: Revisiting an Old Debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In India, for the two major agricultural seasons, kharif and rabi, and for both the seasons pooled together, Gaurav and Mishra's findings suggested the existence of an inverse relationship, even when they treated factors such as household types, social groups, agro-climatic zones and agricultural seasons as fixed effects [15]. The result was also robust in correcting for selection bias.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In India, for the two major agricultural seasons, kharif and rabi, and for both the seasons pooled together, Gaurav and Mishra's findings suggested the existence of an inverse relationship, even when they treated factors such as household types, social groups, agro-climatic zones and agricultural seasons as fixed effects [15]. The result was also robust in correcting for selection bias.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, the family revenue per labour takes the form of a quadratic function to represent its change rule. For land endowment, eliminating the impact of institutions, technological progress, etc., it is confirmed that grain yield per hectare decreases with farm size worldwide [15], [16], which is the famous Inverse Relationship (IR). With farm size continuously increasing, grain yield per hectare decreases at a diminishing rate.…”
Section: Estimation Methods and Data Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which led to the degradation of their natural resource that causes less productivity (Sial et al, 2012). In developing countries, this inverse relation was found by Desiere (2016), Gaurav & Mishra (2014), Bhalla & Roy (1988), Feder (1985 and Fan & ChanKang (2003). Nevertheless, Sadhu & Singh (1996) found positive relation between farm size and productivity.…”
Section: Relationship Between Farm Size and Adoption Levelmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Much of the discussion of what constitutes sustainable agriculture has revolved around the role of these specific practices in the achievement of sustainability. For example, for some, especially those who argue for an agroecological approach to sustainability, farm size (Gaurav & Mishra, 2015;Kull, Carrière, Moreau, Ramiarantsoa, Blanc-Pamard, & Tassin, 2013;Woodhouse, 2010) and the structure of farm ownership (Dogliotti et al, 2014;Fernandes & Woodhouse, 2008;Hamilton, 2014;Woods, 2014) are central to sustainable agriculture. Some argue that sustainable agriculture can only be achieved on small or family farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%