Farm level implementation of soil conservation measures: farmers’ beliefs and intentions

Abstract

Understanding motivating factors for taking soil conservation measures is seen as key to improving on-farm implementation. However, to date only few on-farm conservation measures have been investigated. The objective of this paper is to investigate the influence of farmers’ subjective beliefs on their intention to apply and actual implementation of cover cropping, with the region of Brandenburg (Germany) as a case. An additional objective was to investigate how these insights can contribute to increase farm level implementation of soil conservation measures. Theory of planned behavior provides an approach to understand human behavior by analyzing farmers’ subjective beliefs. Our results, based on a survey of 96 farmers, show that attitudes (ATTs) and perceived difficulty significantly explain variations in intention to apply cover cropping, with ATTs being generally very positive. We discuss that, in this case, the most effective way to increase on-farm implementation is to decrease the farmers’ perception of difficulty. This can be achieved by providing information to farmers on how to overcome barriers to implementation of conservation measures. In-depth insights into belief structures reveal what kind of information is most useful in the case of cover cropping.

How farmers’ characteristics influence spontaneous spreading of stone bunds in the highlands of Ethiopia: a case study in the Girar Jarso woreda

“…For instance, a farmer who positively values farming as a way of life may be more willing to conserve the soil by using new technologies (Willock et al 1999). Furthermore, perceived usefulness of a technology, social capital and perceived ease of implementation influence farmers' intention to adopt and implement a technology (Werner et al 2017;Zeweld et al 2017).…”

Just don’t call it climate change: climate-skeptic farmer adoption of climate-mitigative practices

“…Research that delves deeper into the pathways between beliefs and pro-environmental practices among farmers, including studies utilizing the expectancy-value model [18], the theory of planned behaviour [19], and the Values-Beliefs-Norms theory [20], confirm a more complex picture of farmer decision making [21][22][23]. One overarching implication of this research is that, counter to many popular preconceptions, not all or even many farmers are purely rational utility maximizers [24][25][26].…”

Understanding German farmer’s intention to adopt mixed cropping using the theory of planned behavior

“…However, our measurement of subjective norm, i.e., the applied indicators, differs from these studies. Often the subjective norm is conceptualized referring to overall social pressure perceived from significant others, e.g., "People who are important to me (...)" (e.g., Werner et al 2017). In contrast to that we differentiated the injunctive norms between social pressure from politics, society, and other farmers.…”

“…Based in social identity theory the TPB has therefore been extended to include injunctive group norms separately. Group norms have been shown to influence for instance farmers' intention to perform agri-environmental related measures (van Dijk et al 2015;Werner et al 2017). As this social pressure in the form of an injunctive norm from a particular peer group is only perceived if the individual identifies strongly with this group (Terry et al 1999), we chose to separately include the group of farmers in our applied framework.…”