2005
DOI: 10.1137/030602332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farkas-Type Results With Conjugate Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-infinite versions of Lemma 4, with f t : R n → R convex for all t ∈ T , are [16], Theorem 4.1 (where C = R n and f : R n → R) and [3], Theorem 5.6. Observe that if f is either linear or continuous at some point of A then, by Theorem 1, we can replace (4.4) with…”
Section: Lemma 4 Let σ Be Fm and α ∈ R Then F (X) ≥ α Is Consequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Semi-infinite versions of Lemma 4, with f t : R n → R convex for all t ∈ T , are [16], Theorem 4.1 (where C = R n and f : R n → R) and [3], Theorem 5.6. Observe that if f is either linear or continuous at some point of A then, by Theorem 1, we can replace (4.4) with…”
Section: Lemma 4 Let σ Be Fm and α ∈ R Then F (X) ≥ α Is Consequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farkas-type results for convex systems (characterizing families of inequalities which are consequences of a consistent convex system σ) are fundamental in convex optimization and in other fields as game theory, set containment problems, etc. Since the literature on Farkas lemma, and its extensions, is very wide (see, e.g., the survey in [15]), we just mention here some works giving Farkas-type results for the kind of systems considered in the paper: [3,11,16,22] for semi-infinite systems, [9,14,17,21] for infinite systems, and [8,18,19] for cone convex systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been studied extensively under various degrees of restrictions imposed on f t , t ∈ T or on the underlying space and many problems in optimization and approximation theory such as linear semi-infinite optimization and the best approximation with restricted ranges can be recast into the form (1.1), see for example [8,16,17,23,24,33,35,36,38,40,41,42]. Another important and classical example of (1.1) is the following so-called conic programming problem, which recently received much attention (cf.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof follows from (3.4). It is well known that the Farkas lemma has a great deal of applications in optimization (see [3], [5], [7], and references therein). Observe that Theorem 3.1 yields directly the strong Lagrange duality and stable strong Lagrange duality for the problem…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To each version of the stable Farkas lemma corresponds a stable (strong) duality theorem showing that strong duality still holds whenever perturbing the objective function of the primal problem with a linear continuous functional (see, e.g., [2], [14]). Some of the recent versions of the Farkas lemma (see, e.g., [3], [5], [6], [7], [10], [15]) are so general that the following question arises in a natural way: is it possible to approach the fundamentals of mathematics from suitable generalized versions of the Farkas lemma?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%