2001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farbduplexsonographische Darstellbarkeit von Nierenarterien und Erkennung hämodynamisch relevanter Nierenarterienstenosen

Abstract: An experienced physician using a high quality colour-coded duplex-machine can reliably detect the renal arteries. The presence of RAS can be diagnosed with certainty by CCDU applying the criterion of RAR > 3.5, but the diagnosis of a one-sided haemodynamically relevant RAS can only be certain if the criterion of dRI > 0.05 is used in addition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis was made in most cases by duplex ultrasound (Ultramark 9 HDI and HDI 3000, ATL, Bothell). Unilateral RAS were classified as hemodynamically relevant (≥ 70%) when the side difference of the intrarenal RI according to Pourcelot (systolic peak flow velocity − end‐diastolic flow velocity = systolic peak flow velocity) was more than 0.05 as described previously [36] and confirmed by intra‐arterial angiography performed prior to intervention. Indication for intervention was predefined as atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis ≥ 70% in patients with hypertension with or without renal insufficiency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis was made in most cases by duplex ultrasound (Ultramark 9 HDI and HDI 3000, ATL, Bothell). Unilateral RAS were classified as hemodynamically relevant (≥ 70%) when the side difference of the intrarenal RI according to Pourcelot (systolic peak flow velocity − end‐diastolic flow velocity = systolic peak flow velocity) was more than 0.05 as described previously [36] and confirmed by intra‐arterial angiography performed prior to intervention. Indication for intervention was predefined as atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis ≥ 70% in patients with hypertension with or without renal insufficiency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unilateral renal artery stenosis was classified as hemodynamically relevant if the difference in intrarenal resistance index according to Pourcelot between the 2 renal arteries was Ͼ0.05. 30 Before intervention, duplex ultrasound was always confirmed by angiography showing a percent diameter stenosis Ն70% on visual estimation. The visual estimate was checked by quantitative computerized angiography (QCA-CMS, Medis Medical Imaging Systems) (Table).…”
Section: Patient Selection and Renal Stent Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a highly specific correlation between a side difference of an RI of greater than or equal to 0.05 and an angiographic diameter stenosis of at least 70% in the presence of a unilateral RAS [14][15][16][17]. In case of bilateral RAS, the side difference of the RI is not predictive; in this situation an acceleration time of greater than 0.07 seconds is the most reliable duplex crite rion for an angiographic ally confirmed stenosis of at least 70% ( Fig.…”
Section: Imaging Techniques Angiographymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…All other duplex parameters, such as a peak systolic flow velocity greater than 200 cm/sec or the renal aortic flow velocity ratio greater than 3.5 [19,20] as used in most former studies to detect stenosis, are correlated to a 50% or 60% angiographic diameter stenosis and are therefore not specific for a hemodynamically relevant RAS and detect already mid-grade stenosis [15]. If duplex ultrasound can be performed by an experienced physician with an adequate ultrasound machine, this should be the preferred diagnostic and follow-up imaging method.…”
Section: Imaging Techniques Angiographymentioning
confidence: 98%