Faraway Siblings, So Close: Ephemeral conviviality across the Wakhan divide

Abstract

In this article, I set out to explore the possibility of a shared life between two places in the highlands of Pakistan and Tajikistan—a region dissected by Afghanistan's narrow Wakhan corridor, by present-day nation-state boundaries, by historical divisions between Central and South Asia, and by a former Cold War frontier. Moving away from a take on conviviality as specifically tied to urban spaces and face-to-face encounters, I attempt to trace the processes that determine the coming and going of shared modes of being. In doing so, I first situate the two places—Karimabad and Khorog—in their respective post-Cold War borderlands and point to their historically ambivalent status as ‘marginal’ places at the frontier, culturally diverse ‘hubs’, and sites of globalization. Then I analyse the historical build-up—material and ideological—that led to the establishment of specific forms of connection and disconnection between the two places. In the last part of the article, I discuss how people in and from Karimabad and Khorog seek out opportunities to attain shared instances of common sociality, which often remain ephemeral and subject to regimes of power. Finally, I argue that the cases of these two ‘marginal hubs’ highlight the importance of looking beyond the conventional ‘imperial centre’ when debating the dynamics that lead people to desire, create, and abandon ties across difference.

The Belt and Road as political technology: Power and economy in Pakistan and Tajikistan

“…Infrastructure and logistics are mechanisms that enable BRI investments in Pakistan; crucially, they fall under the ambit of military bureaucratic authorities. Yet, expertise is not isolated from the social environment (Karrar and Mostowlansky, 2018;Mostowlansky, 2019). Engineering projects are not realized through mathematics and metrics only.…”

Humanitarian affect: Islam, aid and emotional impulse in northern Pakistan

“…The rise of these institutions and the eventual merging of local humanitarian aspirations such as Qudratullah Beg'swith a much broader, ideologically driven civilizational outlook can be understood in light of, amongst other factors, the geographical location of northern Pakistan and its status as a disputed territory from partition to the present. Against this backdrop, twentieth-century northern Pakistan was both a Cold War borderland (Mostowlansky 2019) and a frontline in the Kashmir conflict, both of which defined the region as a protectorate within a liminal stateneither inside nor outside, neither part of the country nor of any other place. As a result, Pakistani rule has perpetuated patterns of colonial domination, from partition to the abolishment of the region's princely statesincluding Hunzaand the creation of the Northern Areas in 1974 and, finally, the introduction of a cosmetic form of political participation under the new name Gilgit-Baltistan in 2009(see, e.g.…”

“…I employ local historical sources and archival material from the India Office records at the British Library, as well as ethnographic fieldwork in northern Pakistan since 2012, during which I have researched mobility and the translocal connections of humanitarians, not only to other parts of the country, but also across its borders to Afghanistan, Tajikistan, India, and diasporic settings in Asia and Europe. The actors analyzed in this article are highly mobile, deeply embedded in translocal settings (Freitag and Von Oppen 2010), and steered by the infrastructural conditions that these connections offer (Mostowlansky 2016(Mostowlansky , 2019. For the purposes of this article, I define them as 'itinerant humanitarians'.…”

West-Central Asia: A comparative analysis of students’ trajectories in Russia (Moscow) from the 1980s and China (Yiwu) from the 2000s

“…Instead, these are conceived as spatial configurations that arose in the context of the late 19th and 20th centuries, and within the powerful political, economic, and military agendas evident during this period in both world politics and the organization of academic knowledge (De Lombaerde & Söderbaum, 2013). The rise of such regions also contributed to the reinforcement of the exclusive borders that informed “culture areas” and shaped them as “spatial containers” (Mielke & Hornidge, 2014), the scholarly tendency to unthinkingly recreate methodological nationalism (Mostowlansky, 2014, 2018), the ongoing power of conventional temporal narratives and modes of periodization (Ibañez Tirado, 2015); the emergence of localizing strategies (cf. Fardon, 1990), and zones of theory (Abu-Lughod, 1989).…”