2010
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Far-reaching Deleterious Impacts of Regulations on Research and Environmental Studies of Recombinant DNA-modified Perennial Biofuel Crops in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non‐flowering group II transgenic plants might also prove to be valuable for ultimate deployment because in addition to higher yield and lower recalcitrance, they would enable biocontainment of transgenes. As an outcrossing species, pollen‐mediated transgene flow is a major concern for field release of transgenic bioenergy crops (Stewart, 2007; Strauss et al. , 2010; Ge et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non‐flowering group II transgenic plants might also prove to be valuable for ultimate deployment because in addition to higher yield and lower recalcitrance, they would enable biocontainment of transgenes. As an outcrossing species, pollen‐mediated transgene flow is a major concern for field release of transgenic bioenergy crops (Stewart, 2007; Strauss et al. , 2010; Ge et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the stringent regulation of all forms of direct genetic modification that are in place around the world makes even small field trials very difficult and, in many cases, impossible to carry out (Viswanath et al 2012). The development of robust containment technology would therefore benefit not only from additional laboratory research, but from more discriminating regulatory systems that are based on trait risks and benefits, not on a presumed hazard due to use of recombinant DNA methods (Strauss et al 2010;Meilan et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, the regulatory triggers have become predominantly method-based and have drifted far from the intent of their authorizing statutes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates pest-resistant genetically engineered plants as pesticide-producers even if they produce no novel or broadly toxic pesticides (and may regulate genetically engineered plants with genes that are simply growth regulators) ( 7). The U.S. Department of Agriculture uses plant pest sequences that, on their own, are of no consequence to plant pest risk or that use a former plant pathogen as a vector (now disarmed), as triggers for regulation.…”
Section: Method-focused and Misguidedmentioning
confidence: 99%