2020
DOI: 10.1177/0954410020973904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Far-field drag decomposition using hybrid formulas and vorticity based area sensors

Abstract: Numerical simulation of flow-field has become an indispensable tool for aerodynamic design. Usually, wall surface integration is a tool used to calculate values of pressure drag and skin friction drag, but the aerodynamic mechanism of drag production is still confusing. In present work, in order to decompose the total drag into viscous drag, wave drag, induced drag, and spurious drag, a far-field drag decomposition (FDD) method is developed. This method depends on axial velocity defect and area sensor function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, a threshold value of 𝜁 ≃ 0.95 has been found to provide adequate treatment for the inclusion of the numerical shock domain, in agreement with previous observations by [22,45], whereas detailed discussions on the identification of boundary layer and shock wave regions are given in Reference [46]. 𝑑𝑠 term, indicating conceptually that pressure drag is generated at airframe regions with large viscous displacement under adverse pressure gradients (𝑑𝑉 𝑒 /𝑑𝑠 < 0) [43].…”
Section: Shock Wavessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In practice, a threshold value of 𝜁 ≃ 0.95 has been found to provide adequate treatment for the inclusion of the numerical shock domain, in agreement with previous observations by [22,45], whereas detailed discussions on the identification of boundary layer and shock wave regions are given in Reference [46]. 𝑑𝑠 term, indicating conceptually that pressure drag is generated at airframe regions with large viscous displacement under adverse pressure gradients (𝑑𝑉 𝑒 /𝑑𝑠 < 0) [43].…”
Section: Shock Wavessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results are shown in Table 4. For the L0 grid, the viscous drag of "DP" [47] is larger than that of ONERA by 0.2 counts, which indicates a good match. The wave drag and induced drag also match well between the "DP" and ONERA.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 88%
“…and we call it "Gariepy". According to Qiao et al [47], the first formula Equation ( 46) has the best stability, but the drag prediction accuracy is slightly poor, and the definition of induced drag is lacking. The other two formulas (Equations ( 47) and ( 48)) lack definitions in specific areas.…”
Section: Far-field Drag Decomposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation