2005
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2004.842102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Far-Field–Current Relationship Based on the TL Model for Lightning Return Strokes to Elevated Strike Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) agrees with the trend reported from triggered lightning experiments by Fisher and Schnetzer [27], who measured triggered lightning electric fields at distances of 9.3 and 19.3 m from the base of a metallic strike rod whose height was either 4.5 or 11 m, and found that a strike object appeared to reduce electric fields in its vicinity. The enhancement of vertical electric and azimuthal magnetic fields beyond 2 or 3 km from the lightning strike point due to the presence of a tall strike object is also in agreement with the trend reported by Bermudez et al [28] from their simultaneous measurements of lightning current at the CN Tower and fields at distances of 2 and 17 km. Fig.…”
Section: A Influence Of Lightning Return-stroke Propagation Speedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4) agrees with the trend reported from triggered lightning experiments by Fisher and Schnetzer [27], who measured triggered lightning electric fields at distances of 9.3 and 19.3 m from the base of a metallic strike rod whose height was either 4.5 or 11 m, and found that a strike object appeared to reduce electric fields in its vicinity. The enhancement of vertical electric and azimuthal magnetic fields beyond 2 or 3 km from the lightning strike point due to the presence of a tall strike object is also in agreement with the trend reported by Bermudez et al [28] from their simultaneous measurements of lightning current at the CN Tower and fields at distances of 2 and 17 km. Fig.…”
Section: A Influence Of Lightning Return-stroke Propagation Speedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A tower is called electrically tall when the rise time of the lightning current is smaller than the current wave propagation time along the tower, and therefore, the current injected into the tower top reaches its peak before the arrival of any ground reflections. Correction factors have been derived based on model calculations taking into account multiple reflections of the lightning current pulse at ground level and at the top of the tower (Baba and Rakov, 2007;Bermúdez et al, 2005). Based on triggered lightning data for the US, NLDN peak current errors with an AM and median of −5.6 and −5 %, respectively, are reported (Mallick et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improved blade design has significantly reduced the amount of blade damage. Another observation from the report's northern European data is that only one-third of the lightning faults were caused by direct strikes to the turbine (Bermudez et al, 2005). The other two-thirds were attributed to lightning strikes to the power and telecommunication networks connected to the turbines.…”
Section: Lightning Damage To Wind Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed current parameters within the structure of the strike object are therefore 'disturbed' by the presence of current reflections and the degree of disturbance depends on the physical and electrical characteristics of the strike object (Bermudez et al, 2005).…”
Section: Transient Behavior Of Lightning Current In the Body Of The Tmentioning
confidence: 99%