Fantasy Pitching II: Star Wars vs. Pokemon vs. R&amp;D vs. Uber

Faff, Robert W.; Wallin, Ann; Brosnan, Mark; Carrillo, Naiara; Darmawan, Dhani; Dorris, Alana; Groen, M.; Listiani, Nurlia; Maxwell, V.; Orole, Felix Akinwumi; Pham, Ahn; Salehudin, Imam; Simons, Matt; To, Duy; Tsoi, Jemaine; Wong, Charlane; Woods, Keegan Lee; Nirma, Yossa; Zhaunerchyk, Kate

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2827425

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the following semester, using a fresh student cohort, Faff et al . () extend upon Faff, Ali, et al . (2017h), outlining a similar fantasy research pitch exercise with four groups: (i) Star Wars; (ii) Pokemon Go; (iii) R&D; and (iv) Uber .…”

Section: What About the Extended Family?supporting

confidence: 53%

“…Faff () argues that the pitching research tool provides multi‐faceted benefits – its basic framework simultaneously serves as a research planning tool; a research skills development tool (Faff, ); a research learning tool (Faff et al ., 2017h; Faff et al ., and Ratiu, ); a research agenda‐setting tool (Maxwell, ); a research mentoring tool (Faff et al ., ); a research collaboration tool (Wallin and Spry, ); a research engagement & impact tool (Faff and Kastelle, ); research‐led teaching tool (Faff et al ., ); and a research ‘discoverability’ tool (Faff et al ., 2017). As such, these various dimensions effectively represent many facets of the ‘extended family’ of Faff's () pitching research , as discussed below.…”

Section: What About the Extended Family?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pitching research: ‘qualitative cousins’ and the ‘extended family’

Faff

2018

Accounting & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study has two related goals – one very specific and one more general. The specific goal is to constructively engage with Lodhia (2017) on the issue of whether and to what extent ‘qualitative cousins’ are well served by Faff's (2015) original pitching research (PR) template. Using this ‘cousins’ focus as a primer, the more general goal is to update the agenda created by Faff (2015) and in so doing, explore the ‘extended family’ of PR work/resources now available.

show abstract

Section: What About the Extended Family?supporting

confidence: 53%

Section: What About the Extended Family?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pitching research: ‘qualitative cousins’ and the ‘extended family’

Faff

2018

Accounting & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research

Lodhia

2017

Accounting & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the pitching template proposed by Faff (2015). The article highlights the usefulness of this template for researchers. It is observed that there is scope for adapting this tool, with a template suitable for qualitative researchers being proposed. In the light of the various methodological differences through different research paradigms, it is envisaged that this adaptation will assist in bridging the schism between qualitative and quantitative research. It is also hoped that the proposed enhanced template will encourage qualitative researchers to submit to mainstream accounting journals and quantitative researchers to comprehend the value of qualitative research.

show abstract

Pitching Research

Faff

2014

SSRN Journal

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fantasy Pitching II: Star Wars vs. Pokemon vs. R&D vs. Uber

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Pitching research: ‘qualitative cousins’ and the ‘extended family’

Pitching research: ‘qualitative cousins’ and the ‘extended family’

What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research

Pitching Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About