a This paper provides an update of research into the training of family therapists. Issues from the overarching contexts of adult learning, professional training and current themes in the practice of family therapy are briefly outlined. The early organization of the training research field is seen as being programme orientated, lacking a multi-perspective approach (particularly that of the trainee) and not making use of qualitative research methods. The more recent empirical research is reviewed with these issues to the fore. The paper concludes by providing a new set of research questions, many of which can be addressed by qualitative methodologies and by calling for the research process to be an essential ingredient of training for family therapists aided by the development of the trainer/researcher role.
IntroductionAny discussion of family therapy training should as a first step consider the general context of adult learning and professional education, for it is within this context that important issues and parameters will be found that have a direct bearing on the evaluation of training. Thus, of the models of professionalism that have been identified (Jones and Joss, 1995), the most applicable to the practice of family therapy would appear to be that of the reflective practitioner (Schon, 1983). The role that one is training for with this model is of facilitating the discovery of optimal courses of action and solutions to problems in an uncertain world. The model holds that there are no right single answers, there being a range of possible solutions and courses of actions which can vary from context to context. It is also recognized that the theories which inform such practice may be deficient or incomplete.The tasks of training reflexive practitioners have then to be © 1997 The Association for Family Therapy