Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems

Hogue, Aaron; Dauber, Sarah; Henderson, Craig E.; Bobek, Molly; Johnson, C.; Lichvar, Emily; Morgenstern, Jon

doi:10.1037/e521702015-007

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Multiple reviews have identified both ecological family-based treatments (i.e., Multidimensional Family Therapy; Functional Family Therapy; and Brief Strategic Family therapy) and youth-focused cognitive behavioral therapy as efficacious for ASU (Hogue et al, 2014(Hogue et al, , 2018. Studies have also demonstrated both family approaches and individual approaches as effective in treating ASU within community settings, including when ASU is a target of treatment within the context of other comorbid concerns (Hogue et al, 2015).…”

Section: Hee and Muellermentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting substance use treatment progress for geographically isolated adolescents in community care.

Hee¹,

Mueller²

2022

Journal of Rural Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

i at Ma ¯noa Geographically isolated adolescents and families face barriers that might interfere with substance use treatment progress. Empirical literature for rural isolated youth is limited and it is unclear what therapeutic practices and approaches are associated with their substance use treatment progress. In a study of youth in Hawai'i receiving in-home treatment (N = 634), geographically isolated adolescents made comparable treatment progress relative to their nonisolated peers and had families that were somewhat more likely to be involved in treatment. Multilevel modeling indicated more practice techniques focused on the youth and/or the family predicted better progress. When entered simultaneously, youth-focused practices were the only significant predictor. Consistent monthly youth involvement in treatment predicted better progress, but this was not true for family involvement in sessions. Hawai'i's geographically isolated youth, their ecologies, and system of care policies might contribute to protective factors that support treatment progress, distinguishing them from youth in rural-based treatment studies elsewhere. Public Health Significance StatementGeographically isolated adolescents and their families face several barriers that might interfere with substance use treatment progress. This study found that geographically isolated adolescents in Hawai'i receiving in-home treatment made similar progress in comparison to their nonisolated peers, and had families who were more often involved in services. Further, youth involvement in treatment, and treatment practices focused on both the youth and/or the family predicted better progress.

show abstract

Section: Hee and Muellermentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting substance use treatment progress for geographically isolated adolescents in community care.

Hee¹,

Mueller²

2022

Journal of Rural Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Treatment fidelity is defined as the extent to which a treatment is delivered according to a given standard (Hogue et al, 2015). It includes two factors: (1) Adherence (i.e., the extent of proposed treatment components present in the session); and (2) Competence (i.e., practitioners' skills) (Beidas et al, 2014b;Bearman et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Assessment of 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579 treatment fidelity is a crucial part of understanding if and how a treatment works, and thus an important part of the development of all evidence-based treatments (EBT) (McLeod et al, 2013). Fidelity assessment is also key for the dissemination and implementation of EBT, as it is a prerequisite for both effective training of practitioners and quality assurance of clinical practice (McHugh et al, 2009;Hogue et al, 2015). Primary methods of measuring fidelity are direct (i.e., monitoring of sessions) or indirect (i.e., practitioners' self-report) (Beidas et al, 2014a).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, results from a number of studies highlight the inaccuracy of practitioners' self-report (Carroll et al, 1998(Carroll et al, , 2010Brosan et al, 2008;Beidas and Kendall, 2010). These weak correlations between practitioners and observers are in large part due to practitioners overestimating their levels of adherence and competence, and has been shown in both manualized research treatments and routine practices (Hogue et al, 2015). For example, in a summary of findings from trials with a comparatively large number of recorded sessions of addiction practitioners delivering standard treatment (e.g., CBT and the 12 Steps program), Carroll et al (2010) found that the practitioners frequently overestimated their time spent on EBT.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings

Beckman

Lindqvist²,

Öhman³

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively.

show abstract

Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Predicting substance use treatment progress for geographically isolated adolescents in community care.

Predicting substance use treatment progress for geographically isolated adolescents in community care.

Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About